Kamammy Harris ‘Agenda for Black Men’ will be open to all races and all 26 genders

[Sir ZDuke]

It's going to feel great voting for Jill Stein who has a platform that has solutions that would actually work if enacted.

You could make Jill Stein president today, and she wouldn’t do shyt. Forget the legislative arm of government brehs

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Another deflection.

Why can't you answer a simple question? If we know Dems aren't serious, what are Republicans offering Black people? If nothing, then which candidate/Party can you point to that will do something beneficial for Black people? If not voting at all will benefit Black people, explain how.

Simply criticizing the question doesn't invalidate it, but does call into question your ability & insight to answer it.​

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

Ain’t nobody surprised. Neither candidate doing anything for us

Democrats aren't racist. That works in our favor

 

[tuckgod]

A1 posting

 

[Space Cowboy]

It’s no different than civil rights act or voting rights act. Though targeted for us, everyone benefits. Are you stupid?

 

[Sbp]

They almost had me too... but #Bothsides still remain undefeated

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

Dont play games, stupid. Source and citations backing what you said.

You mean this

Text - S.937 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act

Text for S.937 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act

www.congress.gov

If youre going to talk shyt, be able to back it up with proof. You in here questioning people intelligence dont know how to cite sources. shut the fukk up

So, I read the law. Where does it say it applies to Asians only? Please cite a paragraph.

 

[Stick Up Kid]

It's 2024, and if yall depending on a President to help you in life, you failed.

No President is stopping you from going to school, self-learning, getting educated, getting a job, fixing or building your credit, purchasing property, nice rental etc.

 

[Pazzy]

So, I read the law. Where does it say it applies to Asians only? Please cite a paragraph.

Im trying to help YOU out here remember?

But point is they took action when the asian community asked for it and changed/circumvented the law to meet THEIR NEEDS when they asked. They damn sure didnt do it for the black community. Theyre busy making excuses why they cant because they dont want to. If they wanted to, theyd find a way within the law and wording to do it. You siding with them and their bullshyt shows where you stand with black people IF you really are black and arent anti black.

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

Im trying to help YOU out here remember? But point is they took action when the asian community asked for it and changed/circumvented the law to meet THEIR NEEDS when they asked. They damn sure didnt do it for the black community. Theyre busy making excuses why they cant.

Where's the paragraph?

So, the law is not for Asians only. Thank you.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

2 pages and still no offer/solution from any other party/candidate that benefits Black people.

Just criticism of anything that doesn't specifically benefit/target Black people.

​

 

[At30wecashout]

That's still dodging and moving the goalpost from my original point. You and other posters are giving her and her team entirely too much credit.

If they were really smart about the agenda, then they would have moved in silence and not have brought attention to it because now it's obvious in what they're trying to do.

Moving in silence obviously wasn't going to be an option though with her team being concerned about the black vote heading into the election.

I'm not the average voter either, so watch it.

What are you talking about???? This is a Presidential candidate. Folks on here want tangibles. Regular ass people want to know what she is about, especially the “don’t vote just because she is black/a woman” types, and being someone of sound mind is clearly not enough to beat Trump.


In zero circumstances is someone like Kamala going to be able to step on stage with less than 6 months shrugging and saying “what have you got to lose?” without mentioning a platform is not going to fly. There would not be broad support for peek-a-boo politics where she basically says to vote for her and see what she does.

 

[Taco]

With Trump polling historically low with white women which make up 36% of the voting share, and abortion being the main issue in the battle ground states a lot of you are going to be disappointed

 

[Fani Willis fan]

With Trump polling historically low with white women which make up 36% of the voting share, and abortion being the main issue in the battle ground states a lot of you are going to be disappointed

Vance tried to clean that up in the debate,
but these single my body my choice white women aint going.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

What are you talking about???? This is a Presidential candidate. Folks on here want tangibles. Regular ass people want to know what she is about, especially the “don’t vote just because she is black/a woman” types, and being someone of sound mind is clearly not enough to beat Trump.


In zero circumstances is someone like Kamala going to be able to step on stage with less than 6 months shrugging and saying “what have you got to lose?” without mentioning a platform is not going to fly. There would not be broad support for peek-a-boo politics where she basically says to vote for her and see what she does.

Again what does the shyt you're saying have to do with my overall point

That team doesn't deserve kudo points for this move as they should have announced it from the beginning. If you're fine with being lied to, then that's on you.