Kamammy Harris ‘Agenda for Black Men’ will be open to all races and all 26 genders

[Rekkapryde]

So, like with the Black Farmer case, they are playing smart to avoid being sued but cant directly say things are JUST for black peole

not with republicans suing and being able to count on Trump's supreme court

We know this, but people are playing dumb and ignoring what's going on around the country with anything directly benefitting black people. You gotta do it in a way that doesn't explicitly say just us or it's not going to see the light of day. All DEI programs and initiatives and affirmative action are getting bodied left and right but people playing dumb.

 

[Pazzy]

So, like with the Black Farmer case, they are playing smart to avoid being sued but cant directly say things are JUST for black peole

not with republicans suing and being able to count on Trump's supreme court

shut up shill. I dont see anybody suing the biden administration for the stop asian hate bill which is a specific policy for ASIANS ONLY. Go fukk yourself for lying thinking you can insult black peoples intelligence like her disrespectful ass thinking us black people are dumb.

The shills dont even know the law trying to talk about legality bringing up the equality protection clause to why she cant do anything specifically for black people. Thats not how the law works. Yall dumbass shills just shut the fukk up.

 

[Robbie3000]

It's like people completely forgot what JUST happened with affirmative action.

People like OP don’t care. They just need an excuse to say “something, something plantation…something tangibles”

On the bright side, most of these contrarians are not even registered to vote so we can just ignore them and let them throw their tantrums.

Their elders are coming out in huge numbers in early voting though.

 

[desjardins]

wild, Bernie got bushed for trying to employ the same strategy, even had the "Bernie so black" stuff trending clowning him
establishment Dem does the same thing and people trying spin it as genius and you're an idiot if you think a politician can specifically target black people in america
this shyt all over the place depending on who say or do what

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Deflection

Republicans don't receive over 80% of the black vote

Nikkas don't go to Chik Fila for cheeseburgers

So, it's either vote for the party that gives......nothing........the party that gives something to a lot of people........or, don't vote at all.

Those are the options or do you have a viable option other than one of the above seeing as Election Day is a few weeks away?​

 

[The Intergalactic Koala]

wild, Bernie got bushed for trying to employ the same strategy, even had the "Bernie so black" stuff trending clowning him
establishment Dem does the same thing and people trying spin it as genius and you're an idiot if you think a politician can specifically target black people in america
this shyt all over the place depending on who say or do what

 

[Pazzy]

Ain’t nobody surprised. Neither candidate doing anything for us

And its because they dont want to. They want to keep black people especially ados a permanent underclass hence keeping the institution of racism alive and well knowing that its actually ruining this country. They are telling that to all of our faces and too many of yall have no backbone to get what is OWED to you. Dont EVER let these fools think shyt is okay. FIGHT BACK!

 

[OperationNumbNutts]

So, like with the Black Farmer case, they are playing smart to avoid being sued but cant directly say things are JUST for black peole

not with republicans suing and being able to count on Trump's supreme court

Respectfully, the black farmers case is a totally separate issue. I wouldn't put it in the same categories has Harris' plan or DEI related.

 

[Numpsay]

Seems like you want it both ways. If this was for the people "smart enough" to not see color,who realize "benefit all" policies are what black people need. Why did they need to tell those same black men they crafted an agenda specefically for them? Or were they pandering to fools of my ilk?


The fact they had to explain they werent trying to pul a fast one,tells me enough people took it that way for it to matter. Operation:One Last Big One is still in full swing. But doing your "big one" on black men in 2024 I can assure you wont be as easy as previous years politically

Breh I don't know you personally, but your responses tell me you are too ignorant to bother engaging in this discourse with you.

 

[Ski Mask]

Yeah we aren't getting meaningful help from the government, not on some bootstrap shyt, but by design. Anything promised to us has to be shared effectively maintaining the gap.

 

[O.Red]

So, it's either vote for the party that gives......nothing........the party that gives something to a lot of people........or, don't vote at all.

Those are the options or do you have a viable option other than one of the above seeing as Election Day is a few weeks away?​

Another deflection. Election day being a few weeks away is irrelevant because to y'all there's never a good time to criticize anything regarding Democrats

If it were two years from Election day it would still the the same "You nikkas betta not say nothin" reasoning

 

[Rekkapryde]

Yeah we aren't getting meaningful help from the government, not on some bootstrap shyt, but by design. Anything promised to us has to be shared effectively maintaining the gap.

exactly why we should fight against anything directly helping others and not us. Fight fire with fire.

 

[bnew]

A.i generated explanation:

Imagine a fishnet designed to catch fish in a lake. While the primary intention of the fishnet is to capture fish, it also ends up catching other valuable seafood like shrimp, crabs, and even small turtles. These additional catches are not only a bonus but also contribute to a more diverse and abundant harvest.

Similarly, when a U.S. policy is created with the intention of benefiting the general population or addressing a particular issue, it can have the positive effect of benefiting one group more significantly than others. This is because different groups may have different needs or circumstances that make them more receptive to the benefits of the policy. For example, a policy aimed at improving education might benefit low-income communities more significantly because they often face greater educational challenges.

Just as the fishnet's design ensures it catches fish while also bringing in other valuable seafood, a well-crafted policy can lead to widespread benefits that extend beyond its original intent.

Avoiding Discriminatory Lawsuits​

In simple terms, if a policy is designed to be fair and inclusive for everyone—like the fishnet catching various types of seafood—it reduces the likelihood of being seen as discriminatory. Here’s why:

• Broad Application: The policy applies broadly across different groups, ensuring that everyone has an opportunity to benefit.
• Fairness in Impact: While one group may benefit more significantly due to their specific needs or circumstances, this does not mean the policy is discriminatory. Instead, it reflects how well-designed policies can address various needs within different communities.
• Equal Opportunity: By ensuring that everyone has an equal chance to benefit from the policy (just like all seafood has an equal chance of being caught by the net), it minimizes claims of favoritism or discrimination.

This approach helps create policies that are both beneficial and legally sound. Even if one group benefits more than others due to their unique situation, this can be seen as a positive outcome of a well-designed policy rather than an act of discrimination.

---

chess not checkers

 

[Still Benefited]

Breh I don't know you personally, but your responses tell me you are too ignorant to bother engaging in this discourse with you.

Thats fine,maybe you can answer this simple question someone else asked,and i wont respond.

So why say in the first place then? You run the risk of having some of those voters not knowing the actual reasoning behind the pivot and think that you’re doing a rug pull by changing the messaging.

Sounds like her team didn’t think it all the way through before putting it out there.

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

Respectfully, the black farmers case is a totally separate issue. I wouldn't put it in the same categories has Harris' plan or DEI related.

The commonality is the precedence that this current supreme court has been trying to establish with race neutral policies. If the black farmers bill was shot down for the language not being race neutral enough than it stands to assume that Harris making a law that is specific to black men would be shot down as well.