Kamammy Harris ‘Agenda for Black Men’ will be open to all races and all 26 genders

In The Zone '98

Superstar
Joined
Oct 30, 2017
Messages
11,556
Reputation
1,347
Daps
37,558
So why say in the first place then? You run the risk of having some of those voters not knowing the actual reasoning behind the pivot and think that you’re doing a rug pull by changing the messaging.

Sounds like her team didn’t think it all the way through before putting it out there.

Because the competition has no plan for black people or any group
 

Numpsay

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
15,060
Reputation
2,282
Daps
39,634
Reppin
PAT 2 HTown
Thats fine,maybe you can answer this simple question someone else asked,and i wont respond.
I’ve already replied to a similar post from the same poster. I don’t believe it’s Kamala’s responsibility to also give a civics class with her proposed legislation. As a voter it is on oneself to educate themselves on what is needed to attain what they are basically demanding. Most “voters” that only show up every 4 years to demand stuff from presidents aren’t really voters at all. This “we want black exclusive policies“ mantra is empty rhetoric and the people championing it will never swing an election one way or the other anyway. It shouldn’t take Kamala to tell y’all that at this point.
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
43,563
Reputation
4,557
Daps
134,644
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
I’ve already replied to a similar post from the same poster. I don’t believe it’s Kamala’s responsibility to also give a civics class with her proposed legislation. As a voter it is on oneself to educate themselves on what is needed to attain what they are basically demanding. Most “voters” that only show up every 4 years to demand stuff from presidents aren’t really voters at all. This “we want black exclusive policies“ mantra is empty rhetoric and the people championing it will never swing an election one way or the other anyway. It shouldn’t take Kamala to tell y’all that at this point.
You need their vote to win though unless you think you can do it without them.
 

OperationNumbNutts

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
6,642
Reputation
695
Daps
19,090
The commonality is the precedence that this current supreme court has been trying to establish with race neutral policies. If the black farmers bill was shot down for the language not being race neutral enough than it stands to assume that Harris making a law that is specific to black men would be shot down as well.
I see. I think we are talking about two separate issues. I thought you were referring to the lawsuit regarding black farmers being legally discriminated against.
 

Jalether

Superstar
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
10,587
Reputation
1,921
Daps
39,082
I'm not sure why you think they need to do this to gain your vote or people that think similarly to you, which doesn't include all black men. They are going to win this election without y'all, and still seek to pass legislation that helps improve the quality of life for black people. Most of us are smart enough to realize a law doesn't have to be exclusive for black people to be of major benefit to us. I don't think they tried to pull anything, they knew the people that are actually going to vote are smart enough to realize that can't propose legislation for blacks/men only, but should be able to understand how it would benefit them. People of your ilk want to put up this firewall and argue for something that isn't possible then facetiously complain about it. shyt is dumb breh.
Facts upon facts

Take housing for example, if she wins and is able to fix the housing and rent issue in the country, that benefits everyone including black people

A great economy benefits black people as well and despite the current inflation caused by corporations price gouging (another issue she promised to fix) the economy is trending significantly upwards from where trump left it and we know Republican administration always leave the economy in a mess since the days of Reagan
 

At30wecashout

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
36,386
Reputation
18,411
Daps
166,284
You underestimate how dumb and uninformed the average voter is if you put that much faith in them.

You got people out here able to vote who struggle to read and do basic math, yet you actually put faith in them being aware enough to know how things work politically :mjlol:
Bruh I said a platform, not specifics.

Asking for a thing is a lot different from a package of things. If someone is asking for a whole ass platform, they should (not will) understand how it works. For those who don’t know, and this is elitist I know, should be listened to the same way you would a ranting 5 year old after they come home from school.

“Uhuh.”
“Yeah.”
“Thats crazy.”

Some people will never be happy and its because they dont understand or dont want to understand things. Shape the message for the people who read more than 140 characters at a time and let it rock.
 
Last edited:

Adeptus Astartes

Loyal servant of the God-Brehmperor
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
11,207
Reputation
2,708
Daps
68,417
Reppin
Imperium of Man
:camby: shut up shill. I dont see anybody suing the biden administration for the stop asian hate bill which is a specific policy for ASIANS ONLY. Go fukk yourself for lying thinking you can insult black peoples intelligence like her disrespectful ass thinking us black people are dumb.

The shills dont even know the law trying to talk about legality bringing up the equality protection clause to why she cant do anything specifically for black people. Thats not how the law works. Yall dumbass shills just shut the fukk up.
The "Asian Hate Bill" was NOT for Asians only and it wasn't a bill. It was an EO that expenses hate crime tracking for all races and included directives to minimize Asian targeting language during Covid.

Yes, civil rights law prevents anyone, especially government, for offering services exclusively to one race.

You have no intelligence to insult.
 

The Fade

I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
24,007
Reputation
7,368
Daps
130,870
Because hating as model minorities

It’s like this— you got a couple kids doing bad in class so the teacher gives them extra help. And then some kid from a good family with tutoring + a dad who does math really well says “how come you’re not giving all of us a extra help” while he has an A and the rest of students are doing decent

On Reddit they cry all day about “no one cares about us” while their numbers look good and they have all the resources + they benefit from “ we do good in school and work hard” PR
 

Pazzy

Superstar
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
27,857
Reputation
-6,966
Daps
44,551
Reppin
NULL
The "Asian Hate Bill" was NOT for Asians only and it wasn't a bill. It was an EO that expenses hate crime tracking for all races and included directives to minimize Asian targeting language during Covid.

Yes, civil rights law prevents anyone, especially government, for offering services exclusively to one race.

You have no intelligence to insult.

Source and citations??? You know you have to back what you just said with sources to validate what you just said, right? Copmala got you working overdrive huh?
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
40,030
Reputation
8,610
Daps
100,261
A.i generated explanation:

Imagine a fishnet designed to catch fish in a lake. While the primary intention of the fishnet is to capture fish, it also ends up catching other valuable seafood like shrimp, crabs, and even small turtles. These additional catches are not only a bonus but also contribute to a more diverse and abundant harvest.

Similarly, when a U.S. policy is created with the intention of benefiting the general population or addressing a particular issue, it can have the positive effect of benefiting one group more than another in unintended but welcome ways. Even though the policy wasn't specifically crafted to favor one group over another, its broad and inclusive design ensures that everyone benefits, with some groups experiencing particularly significant advantages.

Just as the fishnet's design ensures it catches fish while also bringing in other valuable seafood, a well-crafted policy can lead to widespread benefits that extend beyond its original intent.

Avoiding Discriminatory Lawsuits​

In simple terms, if a policy is designed to be fair and inclusive for everyone—like the fishnet catching various types of seafood—it reduces the likelihood of being seen as discriminatory. Here’s why:
  • Broad Application: Just as the fishnet doesn’t target just one type of seafood but catches many, a policy that applies broadly across different groups avoids singling out any one group for special treatment.
  • Equal Opportunity: By ensuring that everyone has an equal chance to benefit from the policy (just like all seafood has an equal chance of being caught by the net), it minimizes claims of favoritism or discrimination.
  • Fairness: When policies are designed with fairness in mind and aim to improve conditions for all, they are less likely to be challenged as discriminatory because they do not intentionally favor one group over another.
This approach helps create policies that are not only beneficial but also legally sound and less prone to lawsuits alleging discrimination.




chess not checkers :youngsabo:

"Fishermen sometimes catch and discard animals they do not want, cannot sell, or are not allowed to keep. This is collectively known as “bycatch.” Bycatch can be fish, but also includes other animals such as dolphins, whales, sea turtles, and seabirds that become hooked or entangled in fishing gear.

For NOAA Fisheries, bycatch refers to “discarded catch of marine species and unobserved mortality due to a direct encounter with fishing vessels and gear.” These unintentionally caught animals often suffer injuries or die.

NOAA Fisheries is committed to continuing to reduce and minimize bycatch now and into the future. Our investment in bycatch reduction is spread across multiple program areas and laws"



"Bycatch can negatively affect species such as dolphins, sea turtles, protected fish, and whales by harming animals, contributing to population declines, and impeding population recovery. Other impacts of fisheries on marine mammals may include removal of their preferred prey and sometimes habitat damage"


But,if you dont see the harm with plans designed to uplift one group of fish(whites). That dont really take into account the potential negative impacts on other life in the sea and other environments:manny:

This is why America is in shambles,different demographics,different environments(often divided by race) need specefic policys. The Dems could easily create a poverty specefic policy if they wanted to create something that caters to black people more than "crypto investments":mjlol:.

But yall keep talking like theres no way to target black peoples specefic needs if they wanted to. Its obvious many are just providing cover for the Dems:respect:
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
43,563
Reputation
4,557
Daps
134,644
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
Bruh I said a platform, not specifics.

Asking for a thing is a lot different from a package of things. If someone is asking for a whole ass platform, they should (not will) understand how it works. For those who don’t know, and this is elitist I know, should be listened to the same way you would a ranting 5 year old after they come home from school.

“Uhuh.”
“Yeah.”
“Thats crazy.”

Some people will never be happy and its because they dont understand or dont want to understand things. Shape the message for the people who ready more than 140 characters at a time and let it rock.
That's still dodging and moving the goalpost from my original point. You and other posters are giving her and her team entirely too much credit.

If they were really smart about the agenda, then they would have moved in silence and not have brought attention to it because now it's obvious in what they're trying to do.

Moving in silence obviously wasn't going to be an option though with her team being concerned about the black vote heading into the election.

I'm not the average voter either, so watch it.
 

Pazzy

Superstar
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
27,857
Reputation
-6,966
Daps
44,551
Reppin
NULL
You said it was 1, a bill, and 2, for Asians only. Where's your citation? :unimpressed:

Dont play games, stupid. Source and citations backing what you said.

You mean this


If youre going to talk shyt, be able to back it up with proof. You in here questioning people intelligence dont know how to cite sources. :mjlol: shut the fukk up
 
Top