if you can explain to me how a single witness overrides this wheelhouse of fukkery that was going on before she even got on the stand, then cool. you already spent all this time squeezing every bit of life out of the search function hoping to find a layup dirtbag racist lol.
so i'll post another one. maybe i don't know what the fukk im talking about
Following about seven hours of deliberation, a jury found Marc Wilson guilty of involuntary manslaughter for the June 14, 2020 shooting death of Haley Hutcheson. He was found not guilty on all other counts, including the felony murder charge in the original indictment.
www.statesboroherald.com
because this looks absolutely ridiculous and to be by far the theme of the entire case. she could've agreed with everything he said and he's still screwed
You keep reposting the same shyt - you are so fukkin incompetent at this. Now I’m about to bury you off your own shyt. Nothing more ego- fueled than an incompetent idiot.
In a legal sense, eyewitness testimony refers to an individual's firsthand account of an event that they witnessed (usually one that is suspected to be or considered to be a crime). A witness is someone who has firsthand knowledge about a crime through their senses and can certify to its happening and someone who has seen an event at firsthand is known as an eyewitness.
An "eyewitness" is typically a
victim or
bystander who was present at an event that is under criminal investigation (such as a robbery, assault, or murder). "Testimony" is that person's description of what they observed during the event, including those present who were involved in the crime.
“While its role is complex, eyewitness testimony is a crucial part of the criminal justice system. When a legal team presents an eyewitness who can confidently identify the suspect and confirm that they saw them commit a crime, jurors or judges are compelled to believe them.”
———
“Eyewitness Testimony” is still considered an integral part of criminal justice system. Eyewitness testimony is based on human discernment, which is malleable and can be easily distorted without consciousness leading to erroneous identification. It is one of the major causes for wrongful convictions. An eyewitness may be helpful in criminal investigation and prosecution as he/she may recall criminal activities, identify the perpetrator, or provide useful information related to a crime (Morgan 3rd et al.
2011). But several studies conducted by renowned psychologists in the last three decades and recent cases of exoneration by DNA analysis has made eyewitness testimony a questionable investigation tool per se that aids the criminal justice system.
Eyewitness testimony is a form of direct evidence which may be regarded as valuable for the forensic purposes. In the absence of any other crucial evidence, the testimony of an eyewitness is considered putative by the law enforcement agencies. Therefore, the criminal justice system faithfully relies on an eyewitness testimony to ascertain facts relating to a crime or an event of miss happening. Recalling the events of crime is primarily a cognitive process which is influenced by many factors, and sometimes, we may have little control over the internal and external factors (Safer et al.
2016).
+
combo was so powerful that half the choir stopped singing.
c00ns everywhere huh
) in that room.
