TELL ME YA CHEESIN FAM?
I walk around a little edgy already
@BlackMajik update the title you c00n fakkit!!
This is why I replied to someone else that this isn't an example of "I told you so", it's more like "damn, the coli is consistently wrong about these sorts of matters"
How was he railroaded, they found him guilty of unintentionally assaulting her. Are you reading what you're quoting, if so, what specific issue do you take with it because you and others are failing to express it beyond "he was railroaded"
@Matt504 is a known c00n. Just neg him and keep it moving.Now you are lying. I never said he was found guilty of manslaughter.
You keep showing the brehs who you are though. This is illuminating.
@stringerbell, for all of his faults, was probably right about you.
Your exact words to me, was you didn't want to ban bet me solo. and would only accept it if others joined in.How the fukk did I duck my own bet?
How the fukk u gonna amend my bet?
I called out the entire forum
You accepted.the bet
I wanted all the c00ns to take the bet.. including the lone fakkit who is dapping your posts,they ducked and you accepted it
That wasn’t the case see below.
From the ABC article—-
The mixed verdict signals the jury believed Majors recklessly assaulted his ex-girlfriend, but did not intentionally do so.
The mixed verdict also suggests the jury did not believe Majors intentionally committed aggravated harassment inside the SUV, but did believe he harassed her outside the vehicle by picking her off the ground and throwing her back inside.
Foh..I never said thatYour exact words to me, was you didn't want to ban bet me solo. and would only accept it if others joined in.
IE: ducking.
Foh..I never said that
I told you I wasn't changing the bet just for you
Take it or leave it...you took it
That's harrassment!!
A couple are having a scuffle and it's only his actions that are debated and scrutinised... like she had no part to play.