Fair. Look at it from the other way then. How many teams wouldn’t improve if they traded their best player for Jokic?That’s a bad comparison because you don’t create the same roster with other stars on the team.
Embiid was robbedEmbiid or Giannis should've won last year
takes an organization to win the ship, definitely just a personal thing on your endI’ll be honest. I like Jokic. I’m not one of these nikkas here who hate any superstar athlete who had the audacity to be born white. It just rubs me the wrong way that a 3x MVP has no championship hardware or even a Finals appearance. Maybe that’s a personal fault with me. I just can’t get past it.
The majority of teams don’t have MVP caliber players so it’s an automatic improvement. That said Jokic for Tatum would make Boston better.Fair. Look at it from the other way then. How many teams wouldn’t improve if they traded their best player for Jokic?
Those are team accomplishments.I’ll be honest. I like Jokic. I’m not one of these nikkas here who hate any superstar athlete who had the audacity to be born white. It just rubs me the wrong way that a 3x MVP has no championship hardware or even a Finals appearance. Maybe that’s a personal fault with me. I just can’t get past it.
They’re not overachieving though. They’re landing right where you would expect them to with an MVP caliber player on their team. He’s not dragging them to conference finals or NBA finals. They’ve lost exactly where you expect them to lose. I’m not saying this invalidates him for MVP but the argument that his teams are overachieving isn’t true unless you’re saying to consider the roster without him on it.Those are team accomplishments.
Jokic teams are clearly not championship they overachieve due to his greatness.
No he ain’t. The media doesn’t like him. He will need the one seed and to sweep Denver.KD will win mvp this year.