no he's saying that the media already decided who won MVP a while ago and instead of letting the season play out till the end, theyre just using every jokic game as a confirmation that they're right while ignoring the rest of the field.
Ja Morant takes a shot at the media’s apparent MVP-bias for Jokic (“it’s obvious [who] they want”)
no he's saying that the media already decided who won MVP a while ago and instead of letting the season play out till the end, theyre just using every jokic game as a confirmation that they're right while ignoring the rest of the field.
JodyHiighroller
Superstar
HE, EMBIID & BOOKER
SHOULD BE NECK & NECK
IF WE'RE GOING BY NBA HISTORY.
SHOULD BE NECK & NECK
IF WE'RE GOING BY NBA HISTORY.
"Brehs" on here falling over themselves to make a new thread every time Jokic drops a 20+ point triple double on a bottom feeder like the Magic talking bout "NO ONE IN THE LEAGUE DOES THIS BUT JOKER"... Booker drops almost 50 on his flabby head locking up 60 wins (in a year where most likely no other team gets there at all) ... crickets.
Nuggets aren't even top 5 in the conference, let alone #1-2 like literally every MVP of the last ~50 years not named Westbrook had their team at and the media says "It's neck and neck between him and Embiid ONLY, and Joker has NO HELP AT ALL"... while nobody from the actual best 2 teams in either conference can even crack the top 5 in voting. Booker has been without CP3 since before the all-star break so I don't wanna hear any of that fraudulent shyt about "Him and CP3 steal votes from each other, too much help" like everyone shamelessly tried to peddle last year neither.. It's one thing when coli clowns parrot these trash takes and narratives for daps... these twitter fingers and blogbois who actually end up voting and handing out the career defining awards based on them need their votes taken away, permanently.
Straw Hat Luffy
Veteran
Why are we pretending that the league has been on Jokic nuts all year 
first half of the season it was all about curry and right before Jokic it was all about Embid and basically still is a tie at this point
Just because a fan favorite speaks out doesn’t necessarily make his argument right
first half of the season it was all about curry and right before Jokic it was all about Embid and basically still is a tie at this point
Just because a fan favorite speaks out doesn’t necessarily make his argument right
tremonthustler1
aka bx_representer
Booker's not in the conversation because much of the credit gets attributed to Monty as a coach.
If Ja feels this way, I guess he feels that LeBron or Luka shouldn't be first team All-NBA (assuming they finagle a way to get Jokic and Embiid on first team).
If Ja feels this way, I guess he feels that LeBron or Luka shouldn't be first team All-NBA (assuming they finagle a way to get Jokic and Embiid on first team).
FukkaPaidEmail
Retired Hoodrat whisperer
Where has this “push” for Jokic for MVP been ?
For the majority of the year they completely ignored him while he was putting up
Insane numbers
For the majority of the year they completely ignored him while he was putting up
Insane numbers
Ehhh Jokic putting up better numbers with less personel than Ja tho and now Ja lookin like he might might the rest of the reg season also Memphis 16-2 without jaHE, EMBIID & BOOKER
SHOULD BE NECK & NECK
IF WE'RE GOING BY NBA HISTORY.
Jokie, Embid, Book
Ja won’t even play enough games for serious consideration. He needs to pipe down.
good point
Kobe didn't get mvp for dragging that sorry ass Laker team to the 7th seed in 06 with his historic scoring at the time. they gave that shyt to Nash
can't start changing the narrative now
BINGO
BUT THAT WAS MAINLY THE MEDIAS ANTI-KOBE AGENDA AT PLAY IF WE KEEPIN IT A BUCK
"Brehs" on here falling over themselves to make a new thread every time Jokic drops a 20+ point triple double on a bottom feeder like the Magic talking bout "NO ONE IN THE LEAGUE DOES THIS BUT JOKER"... Booker drops almost 50 on his flabby head locking up 60 wins (in a year where most likely no other team gets there at all) ... crickets.
It's one thing when coli clowns parrot these trash takes and narratives for daps... these twitter fingers and blogbois who actually end up voting and handing out the career defining awards based on them need their votes taken away, permanently.
Best player on the best team wins MVP a lot of time but the problem is that Booker is not the consensus best/most important player on the team.
And he’s actually only played 4 more games than CP3 this season, folks forget he missed a lot of time with COVID earlier in the season
Completely agree.
Just shows how much
THE SAME REASON KOBE WAS ROBBED IN 06 IS THE SAME REASON THE MEDIA CONSTANTLY TRIES TO DOWNPLAY HIS PLACE ON ALL-TIME LISTS
THE AGENDA BEEN PREVALENT FROM THE BEGINNING
Rocket Scientist
Superstar
Honestly MVP is always debatable every year I stopper giving af. I rather check the All NBA lineup. If your team is 16-2 without you then nah. If your team falls apart without you,then its obvious on the impact.