I have a question for @
LionofJudah , and I'm not coming at you disrespectfully so please do the same. Why do you not use scientific or historic evidence to back up your claims. Why do you back up the bible with the bible? For instance when you see Jewish folks trying to prove their claims or even Islamic folks, it's recommended and even encouraged for them to use that type of evidence to prove their claims.
Why the need for the disclaimer?
Anyways, when you say scientific or historic evidence, I very much do use it. Here's the issue though-if something doesn't line up with what the Bible says, it's going to get discarded because that is the ultimate truth if that is the topic that we're dealing with. DNA while useful in many scenarios, is bullshyt when it comes to determining who the Jews are because it's based on a faulty premise to begin with. Take DNA from people currently in the land and use that as the measuring stick for who is a Jew and who's not? That doesn't make sense unless you KNOW they are the real Jews. Biblically, they can't be. Historical evidence is great also, but everybody should know historical records have been tampered with, hidden away, destroyed etc. If you only stick to a mainstream education, you would think Blacks haven't contributed anything to the world but through verification of facts, we know that's not true. People need a spirit of discernment to decipher the wheat from the chaff.