Knicksman20
Superstar
All that shyt is bullshyt anyway there is huge contradictions in the moses story, literally flip a page and it's contradicting itself on the other side. Egypt woudl have looked just like it does now, a mix of semetic and nubian people with mostly semetic lightskinned people. DNA and history has basically proven this. The levant has basically always looked the way it is now and the people there were probably even more lightskinned than arabs before invasions from darker gulf arabs. To claim egypt looked like the congo, is a massive crazy leap. And you are also saying that , right at the sinai peninsula, people on one side of it were dark black, and people on the other side were persian like, that's ridiculous. Egypt especially in the north, and the levant has always been a lightskinned arab looking people who have been changed over and over again by invasions from persians, mongols, greeks, turks, arabs etc.
This fantasy that african american's have invented is absolutely disturbing if you take a step back and just take it all in. And the fact that anybody who is remotely "black" or darkskinned is being grouped in as the ancestors of african american's before slavery is ridiculous. There are many dark skinned people who look similar but the majority of them have a completely different trajectory of cultural evolution in different parts of the planet, the exact same as the different types of "white" people.
Read frued's book about moses it explains all the contradictions in that story and why moses was most likely an egyptian who followed a certain pharoah who tried to turn egyptian religion monotheistic, after that pharoah fell he took his followers to different parts of arabia and the middle east and his decendents eventually settled in the sinai and the levant and created the whole israel deal.
You do realize AE's civilization started in southern Egypt & moved north right? Do you know where the word Egypt came from? A Greek word called Aegyptus or Aigyptos & do you know what where that came from? It's derived from the word "Kmt" or Kemet & do you know what that means? Black land or soil. Depending who you listen to, some scholars say that word only refers to the land & not people. But let me ask you this: If the social construct of white/Black didn't exist, how would you describe a person of color if you've never seen one before? I've read many links where that original word meant burnt faces which makes sense since they were in Africa. And on your Congo comment. That's just plain ridiculous, like all Africans look the same or have the same the same skin color. All across the continent of Africa you can see all shades & facial feature diversity. I only know some of this by research from of a man named Dr. Ben Yosef Jochannan. No shots at you too if you're Arabic: