Stone Cold
Superstar
Do you not understand how a "year" is measured? No hate, a genuine question
What is your explanation for the following? Are these all faked?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
why dont you go to the museum feel them and find out
Do you not understand how a "year" is measured? No hate, a genuine question
What is your explanation for the following? Are these all faked?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Im not trying at all breh. Telling the truth comes natural to the real brehs that try to serve the Creator of ALL things
Nonetheless, I guess we have different definitions of "evidence" or "proof". See, to me, "evidence" doesnt consist of me setting up a rock in a building I call a "museum", then putting a sign up in front of said rock that details what the rock is. No. To me, me placing rock and giving it a backstory, doesnt constitute evidence that the rock is actually what I say it is. For you, that somehow constitutes evidence. This type of flimsy evidence, is probably why you're not on to your leaders and what they have planned for you and those around you in America.
We get it. You're white (in skin color and/or thought process) which is why you have a problem with people calling out the whites IN POWER who have lied to the general population. The same WHITES IN POWER (this means not the average billy bob down the street) who tried to use science to tell the general population that blacks were inferior? Or that doesnt apply to you as a white man/woman? They changed the way we measure time and then named it after pagan idols but yea "that doesnt matter one bit"
You dont know anything about me to know what I give a "fukk" about or not![]()
Not trolling
I want to learn
lol.....lol.....
your post highlights the great flaw of "so called Christians"...
you ask for evidence of so called rocks.... scientists carbon date them... " but of course you are going to reject their evidence because it doesnt fit into your theory of the world"
but you are so hypocritical that you will never subject your own religion to the same scrutiny you apply to others...
what evidence constitutes that Jesus walked the earth breh..... show me something other than that book that was cobbled together by commitee
I cant even say the evidence is flimsy.... because THERE IS NO EVIDENCE....
which is why its called a Faith and not a proof
lol....
and let me be real with you, I dont give a fukk about a mans doctrine, i dont care If you are a Christian, muslim, Scientologist, or a Hebrew Israelite .... anyone with half a brain can pick holes in any holy book, because none of it stands up to even half of the scrutiny that you people yourself put on science...its the hypocritical bullshyt that people like you spout that is just absurd
for the record im a religious man myself but I dont feel the need to disprove science in order to prove my faith... its just asinine
I just wish someone could explain to me how Noah got all those animals on the ark and none of them ate each other......
let me put it to you this way... and for the record Im a Christian..... we have the remains of Egyptian Pharaohs that have been dated thousands of years before Christ was born .... where is the actual PROOF that Christ or any historical figure from the bible existed....
no bones... no evidence..... just a book written by men...... yet millions of people believe a man parted the red sea....without a shred of evidence , yet those same people will put on their foil caps and question anything .....
men wrote the bible, not God, not Jesus... so If dinosaurs arent mentioned could it be possibly because men are mere mortals and dont know everything?
lol.....lol.....
your post highlights the great flaw of "so called Christians"...
you ask for evidence of so called rocks.... scientists carbon date them... " but of course you are going to reject their evidence because it doesnt fit into your theory of the world"
but you are so hypocritical that you will never subject your own religion to the same scrutiny you apply to others...
l
what evidence constitutes that Jesus walked the earth breh..... show me something other than that book that was cobbled together by commitee
I cant even say the evidence is flimsy.... because THERE IS NO EVIDENCE....
which is why its called a Faith and not a proof
lol....
l
and let me be real with you, I dont give a fukk about a mans doctrine, i dont care If you are a Christian, muslim, Scientologist, or a Hebrew Israelite .... anyone with half a brain can pick holes in any holy book, because none of it stands up to even half of the scrutiny that you people yourself put on science...its the hypocritical bullshyt that people like you spout that is just absurd
for the record im a religious man myself but I dont feel the need to disprove science in order to prove my faith... its just asinine
l
I just wish someone could explain to me how Noah got all those animals on the ark and none of them ate each other......
You either stupid or trollingWhy didn't the Native Americans mention dinosaurs?
Why is the model of the dinosaur anatomically off-balance 99% of the time?
Why do they need strings or other support to hold up dinosaur bones at the museum?
There were no discoveries of dinosaurs before the 19th century
Adults believing in dinosaurs![]()
Council of Nicea right?
No they didnt "cobble" the bible together there
Even the jews didn't deny "Jesus" existed which is evidence in itself
About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease. He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him. And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.
- Jewish Antiquities, 18.3.3 §63
thanks for your contribution to this thread brehYou either stupid or trolling
so you're a "Christian" but youre looking for the bones of "Jesus"?![]()
If I hit a nerve, my bad. I was actually interested in what you had to say unlike the other nikka I was quoting.
Listen, I'm not white, nip that shyt in the bud right fukkin now. I don't have a problem with people calling out whites in power. I do have a problem with people calling out what I believe to be true simply because whites said it was true as well. I'm fully aware that science was used to degrade blacks who were and still are physically stronger in an effort to create obediant blacks. And yet studies today tell us that blacks are naturally the stronger race. Do you see what I'm getting at gere?
If the number on the calender means so much to you what have you done about it? If someone asks you for the date you'll say December 14th, 2015. Thats what I meant by it not mattering. Or am I wrong? If you've done anything to change the way you tell time lemme know, I'm not even being sarcastic.
Im not looking for anything...... the point Im making is that there are a lot of hypocritical Christians out there who will reject any scientific argument that goes against the teachings of the bible but at the same time absolutely refuse to hold their own beliefs to that same criteria
..... the point Im making is that there are a lot of hypocritical ATHEISTS out there who will reject any argument that goes against MAINSTREAM SCIENCE but at the same time absolutely refuse to hold their own beliefs to that same criteria
Damn breh. We've been using the same calender pretty much for thousands of years. The Julian calendar was the most widely one used until we switched to Georgian calender - our modern calender - in the 1500s and it just has some minor differences with the Julian Calendar (couple of minutes shorter and the leap years are every 4 years approximately to keep our time in alignment with the earth's revolutions around the sun). The ancient Egyptian calendar was also based on 365 days = 1 year. We as humans have been using minutes, days, months, years, etc for thousands of year to quantify how much time has passed... And no people didn't quantify time differently since it still based on the rotation of the earth, and even earlier, when the sun came up and the sun came down. It's still the same amount of time that passes no matter how you want to quantify it. A different example: You driving at 60 mph is still the same speed if you were driving at 96.56 kmh, even though they are both quantified differently.Yes I understand how they measure a year. What I also understand is that they changed the way "years" were measured long ago which means our measurement of time doesnt relate with those who came before us. Do you agree with this?