Except that lebron's peak along WITH the longevity make him top 5. You out here thinking that going to 10 finals and being one of the best 2 way players of all time isn't an elite peak?
I'm confused at "the did more with less" part also... Duncan won with 4-5 HOFers. Kobe won with a top 10 all time great and all stars, Kareem won with a top 5 all time great and HOFrs, bird won with 4-5 HOFers, Wilt won with a bunch of HOFers, Russell won with a bunch of HOFers, magic won with a bunch of HOFers. Etc etc.
Y'all arguments don't even make sense on the surface, there's no need to go even deep into it. It's just hypocrisy and easy to dismiss
you said the same shyt you're arguing against ... then you literally named better players against yourself
Lebron also jumped teams with superstars, more than Duncan, Kobe, Kareem, Bird, Magic, Russell, Jordan put together
jumped to more teams than 6 men put together dog
more than 6 men put together
and you named people with either similar longevity that did more with injuries
or had shorter careers and still did more success wise ... you literally named the people yourself
thats why I said in another thread top can be subjective... before your emotional outburst I said I can understand why people would rate Lebron high... its not my opinion so I dont care. But its proven fact that he's not the top winning dude or even close to it. Its same to me as the Yankees buying pendants or whatever. Sure Boston and Lakers were stacked, but you run with your squad not away from your squad while compiling every all star you can find to bail you out over and over. He said it himself, that he should have won not 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, but 7 rings just on the Heat. None of that shyt worked out.... he lost in terrible fashion to Tony Parker, Manu Giniobili and Tim Duncan and ran again in one of the lowest watched finals blowouts in history of modern NBA