steph_harden
Superstar
Not prime Bron
That was post prime Bron. Where he could only play defense in stretches. In his Heatle era he was a first team all defense, DPOY candidate level.
Tatum never played against that guy
Not prime Bron
That was post prime Bron. Where he could only play defense in stretches. In his Heatle era he was a first team all defense, DPOY candidate level.
Tatum never played against that guy
1. Oh okay, so they both conveniently fell off a cliff defensively right before JT torched them1 - He never played against Prime Bron. That was post prime Bron.
Bron in his absolute Prime was a top 3 defender who would routinely lock wings up which was around 09-16. His defense fell off big time after that. Same for Kawhi....Kawhi was the league's best wing defender from 14-17. Then he started getting hurt. Tatum wasn't around to go against either one during their peaks.
2 - Of course he's an nba athlete....i'm saying he's not an elite one. He does not have great speed nor explosiveness. Nothing wrong with that...he's still a great player. He's still got great skill.
3 - And why would i care about meaningless regular season games over 6 games played at the very pinnacle. Those 6 games>>>>those 10 regular season matchups.
4 - Book's played twice as many games against the Warriors than Tatum...that's not even a fair sample size. Even with that Tatum's numbers are just marginally better.
I'm not even shytting on Tatum btw i'm a fan. I'm just pointing out the obvious. Do you yourself have any critiques about his game? Or are you gonna just keep making excuses for every shortcoming?
2018 is prime Lebron
Just admit you're a casual fan
The irony.
Lebron was 34 years old in 2018. As amazing as he was that was not his prime. Did you see him play by chance when he was with the Heat? Did you see his 2012 and 2013 seasons?
Did you know that he finished 2nd in DPOY voting for 3 out of 4 years? Anchored an elite defense?
If you think that Lebron and 2018 Lebron are the same guy then imma need you to admit your casual status first.
Micheal Jordan was 35 years old when he won his 6th championship and was a NBA Finals MVP
Any more baseless comments casual?
1. Oh okay, so they both conveniently fell off a cliff defensively right before JT torched them
2. I said he’s a plus NBA athlete. He absolutely does have great speed/explosiveness. Which he routinely uses to blow by defenders on the wing and posterize bigs at the rim. He’s significantly more explosive than Booker, who you inserted into this discussion for some reason.
lol at you wanting to put more stock into meaningless regular season games than a championship basketball series. Wonder why Tatum couldn't replicate that 40 piece on Wiggins with a championship on the line...3. Okay cool, so just say you don’t watch/count anything other than the Finals. Don’t make shyt up and say he struggles against players he’s torched routinely throughout his career
Micheal Jordan was 35 years old when he won his 6th championship and was a NBA Finals MVP
Any more baseless comments casual?
Now you're moving the goal post. First he's not athletic enough to get by defenders, now he's not as athletic as Donovan Mitchell, Paul George or Jaylen Brown. Sure, he isn't in the top 1% of NBA athletes, but he's still blowing by dudes with his first step and dunking over bigs with his explosiveness. His athleticism has never inhibited him at any point in his career like you suggested. It's an advantage for him.Unfortunately...yes.
That's all relative to other nba athletes. For instance his JB his own teammate is an example of an elite athlete...and he's a lot faster/explosive than Tatum is. Tatum just isn't on that tier. He's a good athlete but he's not blowing by guys like he's Donovan Mitchell. It's his combination of size, skill, shooting, strength, footwork and mobility that makes him who he is. His biggest comp was Paul George but would you say he's a better athlete than a 24 year old PG? I don't think you would.
lol at you wanting to put more stock into meaningless regular season games than a championship basketball series. Wonder why Tatum couldn't replicate that 40 piece on Wiggins with a championship on the line...
Now you're moving the goal post. First he's not athletic enough to get by defenders, now he's not as athletic as Donovan Mitchell, Paul George or Jaylen Brown. Sure, he isn't in the top 1% of NBA athletes, but he's still blowing by dudes with his first step and dunking over bigs with his explosiveness. His athleticism has never inhibited him at any point in his career like you suggested. It's an advantage for him.
Okay, cool. So nothing matters but the NBA Finals. Your evaluation of JT as a player is strictly based on those 6 games. Just say that. That is awful, casual ass logic, but okay. That's like evaluating Bron strictly off the '11 Finals, or Kobe off the '04 Finals. Great players have had bad series "with a championship on the line" since the beginning of time. Especially young players.
You most definitely suggested he struggles to beat defenders off the dribble because of lack of athleticism. Don't try to flip it now. Again, he absolutely blows by defenders and gets to the rim at well. This is literally not even disputable, the numbers back it up.Never said that. I said he was not particularly explosive or athletic…which he isn’t. Doesn’t mean he isn’t a good athlete at all…because he is but when I list guys like Mitchell, JB and PG those guys are examples of “particularly explosive and athletic players” And Tatum is clearly not in that tier. That’s all I meant. You’re twisting things like I’m saying Tatum isn’t athletic at all.
And seeing as you watch Tatum all the time and I’m the casual then you would know that he doesn’t really rely on his athleticism to get buckets. He uses a combination of his size, mobility and skill. He’s not going over the top of nikkas like Ja Morant.
Those 6 finals games>>>>>>any regular season matchups. Sure they matter but are insignificant compared to an NBA Finals series…seems like that regular season 40 piece has more meaning to you than what Tatum did in the finals…
Kobe caught heat in 04 but he was already a 3 time champ. He already did it on the highest level . Bron caught the most amount of vitriol ever given to a player after 11 he basically had to come back and prove himself all over again. He fell apart in the finals because he got schemed out…not because of a particular defensive matchup like Tatum
1 - He never played against Prime Bron. That was post prime Bron.
Bron in his absolute Prime was a top 3 defender who would routinely lock wings up which was around 09-16. His defense fell off big time after that. Same for Kawhi....Kawhi was the league's best wing defender from 14-17. Then he started getting hurt. Tatum wasn't around to go against either one during their peaks.
2 - Of course he's an nba athlete....i'm saying he's not an elite one. He does not have great speed nor explosiveness. Nothing wrong with that...he's still a great player. He's still got great skill.
3 - And why would i care about meaningless regular season games over 6 games played at the very pinnacle. Those 6 games>>>>those 10 regular season matchups.
4 - Book's played twice as many games against the Warriors than Tatum...that's not even a fair sample size. Even with that Tatum's numbers are just marginally better.
I'm not even shytting on Tatum btw i'm a fan. I'm just pointing out the obvious. Do you yourself have any critiques about his game? Or are you gonna just keep making excuses for every shortcoming?
Lebron was never a a top defender