This a thread made for me,
@Biscayne you shoulda tagged me...
I'm gonna double back to the comment that the Mid-Atlantic is the best place for black people, but when asking questions like this, we have to define two things:
1, what does "best for Black people" mean, and 2, the drawbacks of black citizens are experienced nationwide, from cities that are 3% black to cities that are 80% black. So you pick your poison and decide whose issues are more tolerable....
There is no Utopia of Black Perfection in the United States...however there are places that are just better than others...
If all things were equal, meaning a static cost of living nationwide, equal representation relative to populations, etc, California would be the best place in the country with no close second. Since we know there is variance, I'll attack it this way first:
I would take California over any southern state besides NC and maybe Florida and Virginia, that's it. And I'm including the Census-designated South here, which includes Maryland. Now, if we break it down to cities vs cities, it makes more realistic comparisons as no states are monolithic across the board...
Most of the South sucks on a statewide level. Texas, just no. Mississippi is likely the worst place for black people in the entire country. I can keep going state by state, I've been to em all down south except Florida, which is why I left them open as potentially better for us. The only southern state I'd definitively place over California is North Carolina, Virginia as a possible...
So any notion that "the South" in and of itself is greater than Cali for us----->flat out no...
The Mid-Atlantic is a transregional area centered on DC-Bmore and includes peripheral areas connected to the culture or economy of DC-Bmore. That means all or parts of Virginia, Delaware, Pennsylvania are all Mid-Atlantic....
Objectively it's one of the worst places for Black people in terms of urban crime and high black poverty. Cats wanna discuss the perks of higher representation, black-themed entertainment and black wealth but leave out the flaws. I'd never live in that region again (formerly in Northern Virginia), it's wildly overrated. If I want high cost of living I get better scenery in almost all California than I get in the DMV...
I also get better weather in Cali, no snow, no freezing temps, etc. I get to educate my kids in a few strong public school systems. I'll put it like this...
Baltimore isn't my cup of tea, never has been, been several times. One of the worst public school systems nationally, one of the most violent cities nationally, one if the highest rates of black poverty nationally, and plenty of corruption in the local politics. Aesthetically almost every neighborhood looks the same. It has great infrastructure and a ton of black people, but just too many flaws. I'd choose Sacramento 10/10 without even blinking, which is strong in the areas Baltimore is weak in, and in its black golden era...
The black population of Sacramento is large enough that you can find plenty of communities of representation to live amongst "us", if that's what you want. And it's actually a growing city while the overall population, and black population, in Baltimore is in decline...
That's just Sac, there's ZERO probability of me taking Baltimore over Los Angeles...
Washington is different because it's Baltimore with federal money, which means better looking neighborhoods, more avenues of opportunity, etc. And DC's housing stock and landscape and architecture is just way more pleasing to the eyes, with way more things to do than in Baltimore. So I'd live in The District proper, but none of the surrounding areas, and certainly nowhere in Maryland...
I've got my daughters with me, I got back to Raleigh yesterday so I'll tap into this thread later tonight when I have more time!