Iran Nuclear Deal: USA remains out under Biden; Russia and Iran collaborating on nuclear items

[KnowDatImReal]

Why does iran want to nuke israel? is it because of the iraq war and israels ties to usa?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Iran never attacked of bother nobody. Let them get a nuke I trust them more than the Saudis.

No you dumb c*nt

Iran has attacked the US abroad THOUSANDS of times.

I swear you dudes just take this anti-USA shyt too far without understanding how the world is really working out here

And If Iran gets a nuke THEN the Saudis and Turks will get them.

THINK!!!!!

 

[Leasy]

No you dumb c*nt

Iran has attacked the US abroad THOUSANDS of times.

I swear you dudes just take this anti-USA shyt too far without understanding how the world is really working out here

And If Iran gets a nuke THEN the Saudis and Turks will get them.

THINK!!!!!

Lol what has Iran done? U.S ruin that country in the 1950s. Saudi has done enough damage to the world without nukes with their terrorists cells around the damn globe from Russia to America. Pakistan got nukes like really breh and ain't shyt pop off Pakistan is unreliable compared to Iran.

The only issue People have with Iran is that their economy with their trades will position them to be the most powerful country in the damn region for decades. No country would be able to compete with Iran and we need them on our side. This ain't checkers this chess dumb ass

 

[ill]

Lol what has Iran done? U.S ruin that country in the 1950s. Saudi has done enough damage to the world without nukes with their terrorists cells around the damn globe from Russia to America. Pakistan got nukes like really breh and ain't shyt pop off Pakistan is unreliable compared to Iran.

The only issue People have with Iran is that their economy with their trades will position them to be the most powerful country in the damn region for decades. No country would be able to compete with Iran and we need them on our side. This ain't checkers this chess dumb ass

Research a topic before you post stupid shyt. Iran is directly and indirectly responsible for a lot of terror around the world. The government is the problem not the Iranian people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_and_state-sponsored_terrorism

Pakistan isn't a threat to Europe or the US in regards to nukes. They are however a very real and dangerous threat to their neighbor, India. Both have nukes pointed at each other and Kashmir is one of the the most tense places in the world.

 

[Robbie3000]

WASHINGTON -- A tentative deal has been reached by senators on a bill to apply congressional oversight to a nuclear deal with Iran.

Under the deal, the president would still be required to submit any final agreement before Congress and Congress would continue to have a say over whether he can lift sanctions on Iran in exchange for restrictions on Iran's nuclear program. But the new deal, hammered out between Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, would reduce the time frame the Senate has to consider the lifting of sanctions -- from 60 days to 52 at most -- and would keep demands on Iran limited primarily to its nuclear program and not, for example, against its sponsorship of terrorism.

An aide to Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, sent over the details of the new bill. It still may face a veto from the president, who has generally opposed efforts to restrict his flexibility when it comes to executing a deal with Iran.

• The bill would require the president to submit the final agreement to Congress.
  
  
• Congress will have up to 52 days to review the final agreement. During that time, the president is prohibited from waiving the congressional sanctions during the review period.
  
  
  
  
• The 52-day review period is broken down as follows: There is an initial review period of 30 days to review and vote on sanctions relief. An additional 12 days are automatically added if Congress passes a bill and sends it to the president, and an additional 10 days on top of that if the president vetoes the legislation.
  
  
  
  
• If the final deal is submitted late, after July 9, the review period reverts to 60 days.
  
  
  
  
• The president is required to certify to Congress every 90 days that Iran is complying with the terms of the final agreement.
  
  
• It also requires the president to make a series of detailed reports to Congress on a range of issues, including Iran’s nuclear program, its ballistic missiles work, and its support for terrorism globally, particularly against Americans and our allies. With this information, Congress will be able to determine the appropriate response in the event of Iran sponsoring an act of terrorism against Americans.

The same general details were confirmed by a Democratic aide familiar with talks to modify Corker's bill.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest wouldn't say if the Iran bill compromise is acceptable to the president, since it still has to be debated and amended by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee later Tuesday. But he suggested it was moving in the right direction.

"There is some reason to think" the emerging bill is something Obama could support, Earnest said during his daily briefing. "But I can't say anything definitive until the process is completed."

Early reaction among Democrats on the Hill seemed generally positive.

"I oppose the initial version of the bill, but I am encouraged by some developments that are taking place," said Senate Minority Whip dikk Durbin (D-Ill.). "I think there is potential for sign-off by the White House on a bill that we can support on a bipartisan basis."

If the new Corker bill goes through, it could dramatically complicate the finalizing of a nuclear deal with Iran. As things stand, a framework for a reduction in Iran's nuclear capacity has been reached but finite details still must be resolved. One particular sticking point is the pace of sanctions relief, with Iran insisting all sanctions be lifted at the onset of the deal, and the United States insisting the framework be built on Iran only getting relief from sanctions once it is verified the country is taking steps to reduce its stockpiles of enriched uranium. A bill from the Senate limiting the pace at which the president can apply sanctions relief could be interpreted as a breach of the framework in Tehran, and could complicate the next few weeks of negotiations.

Corker, however, said he was not convinced that congressional action during the negotiations process would hinder the final outcome.

“We know for a fact that -- this is like, not debatable -- that in Switzerland, as the negotiators were believing that Congress was going to weigh in, the deal got stronger. So, you know, that is a total red herring,” he told reporters on Tuesday.

Democrats likewise seemed unmoved by the administration's pleas (delivered Tuesday directly from Secretary of State John Kerry during a briefing) to give it leeway to turn the framework into something more tangible. Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), who is serving as the interim ranking member on the foreign relations committee, said he was "confident" the new deal struck by Corker would provide "an orderly way to review the agreements when submitted, and a timing notice in the event there are material breaches so Congress can take action."

Later on Tuesday, the committee will begin the process of marking up the new Corker deal, and it remains to be seen if the final language will remain intact. Several senators could offer amendments, though Corker has control over the process and some of those members have already signaled that they don't want to disrupt a tentative deal.

When asked about an agreement to prevent a vote on some of the more controversial amendments, Sen. Chris c00ns (D-Del.) answered, “We will find out if that is a durable agreement when we get to the room. We’ve had lots of agreements in my four years in Senate that once we got to the floor, came unglued.”

“If you look through the dozens of amendments that are on our agenda for today, there are several in there that would pull this bill sharply to the right if adopted,” c00ns told reporters on Tuesday. “Given the partisan breakdown of the committee, they easily could be adopted. They could be forced through down a partisan, party-line vote. I’d drop off of it in a second.”

fukking AIPAC got to the Democrats. Everybody has a price I suppose. Word to Ted Dibiase.

 

[FAH1223]

AIPAC is like clockwork brehs.

These Senators are not allowed to think beyond their partisan and donor lines...

Corker still doesn't have 67 votes to override President Obama's veto, and he knows it. He will get 60 votes to get past a filibuster. Nothing more.

 

[FAH1223]

Also,

I think Ayatollah Khamenei knows that the US will never let sanctions go. Especially with the things about Iran that Congress consistently yaps about such as "not being a democracy", "supporting Hezbollah/terrorism", and just not bowing down.

Iran would have to completely surrender many of its national tools. The Pasadran has to go as well as the Velayet of Fiqh, leaving the French model presidential system. Privatization of the oil industry and full access to its markets is also necessary.
Iran can continue to be anti-Israeli in words only, the same way Saudi and the Gulf are anti-Israel. But they will not be allowed control their economy.

Now the Chinese and the Russians have been pushing for these talks since the beginning. They want Iran to show the world that it has curtailed its program. All they need is an agreement and then they can start to pull Iran into their alliance after UN sanctions on nuclear proliferation are lifted.
The refusal of the US to honor agreements and continued US sanctions will be ignored by them, and they will in future have the economic and political support and even military support to remain independent.

Iran is a crucial part of China's Silk Road Strategy.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Also,

I think Ayatollah Khamenei knows that the US will never let sanctions go. Especially with the things about Iran that Congress consistently yaps about such as "not being a democracy", "supporting Hezbollah/terrorism", and just not bowing down.

Iran would have to completely surrender many of its national tools. The Pasadran has to go as well as the Velayet of Fiqh, leaving the French model presidential system. Privatization of the oil industry and full access to its markets is also necessary.
Iran can continue to be anti-Israeli in words only, the same way Saudi and the Gulf are anti-Israel. But they will not be allowed control their economy.

Now the Chinese and the Russians have been pushing for these talks since the beginning. They want Iran to show the world that it has curtailed its program. All they need is an agreement and then they can start to pull Iran into their alliance after UN sanctions on nuclear proliferation are lifted.
The refusal of the US to honor agreements and continued US sanctions will be ignored by them, and they will in future have the economic and political support and even military support to remain independent.

Iran is a crucial part of China's Silk Road Strategy.

Get the muslim thumb out of your ass.

Iran must be brought to bear for ANY sort of double-cross on this deal.

You understand this, right?

This is beyond your hatred of Israelis. This is about the world.

 

[notPsychosiz]

http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/04/18/406911/Putin-warns-Israel-on-Kiev-arms-delivery

See, this is what I was saying.
The main benifet of the deal to Iran is not the economic benifet that the sanctions lifted provides, but rather the military and legal benifet it provides by them being able to legally ally with Russia and the other SCO actors.

Like now they can get their S-300 surface-to-air missile system from Russia, and Israel is pissed

 

[dtownreppin214]

So tomorrow is the deadline? These Iranians playing games.

 

[88m3]

So tomorrow is the deadline? These Iranians playing games.

Pulled a Greece apparently.

There was an article in the nyt today. I'll see if I can find it.

 

[ill]

The Coli New World Order should be happy and proud about this latest development.

Leaked Document Shows Iran Will be Allowed to Inspect Alleged Nuclear Site Themselves | VICE News

Iran will be permitted to inspect a suspected nuclear work site themselves under a secret deal reached with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), according to documents obtained on Wednesday by the Associated Press

 

[storyteller]

WSJ editorial page editor speaking with a lobbying group and appearing to be anything but objective.

 

[88m3]

Yet another problem of Trump's own creation

 

[rightfultoefinger]

Yet another problem of Trump's own creation

Of course it's heating up again since NK is cooling down and probably was always out of the question anyway. They need a war somewhere soon.