Iran or the US?
Iran Nuclear Deal: USA remains out under Biden; Russia and Iran collaborating on nuclear items
Iran or the US?
How are you not infuriated that a state that unquestionably exports state terrorism, is virulently anti-western, and treats its own people like absolute dog-shyt is now being given a hands-off approach to engaging in runaway nuclear proliferation.This fakkit @Napoleon is to delusional.. no point in getting a debate with him
nikka gets so mad that he change up his font to put out his point
Cry me a river faq go to iran and do something about instead keep complaining and crying like little bytch
This is a motherfukking game-changer and you all will wish to go back to a time before a nuclear middle east.
Why cant you give iran a chance to move on from its past? Its like you dont want them to change? There prob the most westernized country..in that part of the world... while your gov is allied with country like saudi arabia. Give them a chance you delusional fukk and also why are you avoiding not blaming obama for having to do this deal? Stop cherrypicking in your debates fakkit
notPsychosiz
I started this gangsta sh-
This is seriously one of the most fukked up things Obama may ever be attached to.
Anyone who claims to be an american needs to seriously understand the implications of this.
Iran basically gets to develop a nuke...then who? The saudis. Then? The Turks.
Remember the Egyptian nuclear program? I do.
They'll ramp up too
You condone the most unstable part of the world obtaining nukes...and I'm the dumbass?
I'm thankful none of you are in any positions of power.
Sometimes I appreciate republicans for foreign policy and democrats for domestic...at least you know the republican isn't a p*ssy.
Thats not true.
Here, on the coli, we are like the UN. The mods are in power.
And they have passed two banner resolutions telling you to eat dikk.
Until you have those two pink WOAT banners removed, you are under sanctions.
Your post have no economic value, and you put at risk others caught doing backroom deals with you and going against the sanctions by giving you daps or rep.
I didn't want to tell you this Napoleon... but I'm afriaid you are a rogue actor.
And one of these days you are gonna think you are in a film thread... but its gonna be a covert op. Cook, Always, Mid-West, Brooklyn, Liu Kang and Walt are gonna SEAL-TEAM 6 your bytchass and release the pics of the ban like they did Bin Laden.
Then we're all gonna celebrate.
notPsychosiz
I started this gangsta sh-
The middle east countries are land locked. They don't have the range.Aye breh
You think any of those countries could hit Cali?
Russia can hit Alaska...
The asian seaborad (Japan, the Koreas, etc...) plus China are in consideration to have the range to hit Cali.
N.Korea already declared they could.
Russia might also be in consideration in terms of range. I am unsure, exactly.
This fakkit @Napoleon is to delusional.. no point in getting a debate with him
nikka gets so mad that he change up his font to put out his point
Cry me a river faq go to iran and do something about instead keep complaining and crying like little bytch
Dude is pathetic, he's not even using facts to support his argument. You can feel the anger through his responses
Thats not true.
Here, on the coli, we are like the UN. The mods are in power.
And they have passed two banner resolutions telling you to eat dikk.
Until you have those two pink WOAT banners removed, you are under sanctions.
Your post have no economic value, and you put at risk others caught doing backroom deals with you and going against the sanctions by giving you daps or rep.
I didn't want to tell you this Napoleon... but I'm afriaid you are a rogue actor.
And one of these days you are gonna think you are in a film thread... but its gonna be a covert op. Cook, Always, Mid-West, Brooklyn, Liu Kang and Walt are gonna SEAL-TEAM 6 your bytchass and release the pics of the ban like they did Bin Laden.
Then we're all gonna celebrate.
Uh-oh, we just Iran'ed his ass
How about financial sanctions? We should take his Coli - cash
How about we limited his ability to move freely? Ban all access to HL and TLR
Shutup dikk.
I've posted the most sheer informatjon about the history of the Iranian nuclear program than anyone ...but I'm lost.Dude is pathetic, he's not even using facts to support his argument. You can feel the anger through his responses
fukk outta here asswipe
But let's give them nukes
US officials: Iran's militias just failed in Iraq because they can't shoot or coordinate
REUTERS/Thaier Al-Sudani Shi'ite fighters launch a rocket during clashes with Islamic State militants on the outskirts of al-Alam, Iraq, March 8, 2015.
After a nearly month-long assault on the Iraqi city of Tikrit by the Iraqi military and Iranian-backed Shiite militias, the city was finally retaken from ISIS.
Recapturing Saddam Hussein's hometown was expected to only take a few days, but ISIS (aka Islamic State, or Daesh) laid a bunch of improvised explosive devices(IEDs) that shredded Shia militiamen.
And there was another problem, according to US officials: The Iranian-backed militias couldn't shoot very well.
"U.S. officials assessed that the Iranian-backed assault on Tikrit was failing because of the inaccuracy of Iranian artillery and the failure of the Tehran-backed militias to respond to orders or coordinate their movements with the Iraqi security forces nominally leading the fight," The Wall Street Journal reports.
Tikrit was only successfully retaken once the US started conducting airstrikes against the militants, which effectively sidelined the Shiite militias. Three militias explicitly linked to Iran, the Asaib Ahl al Haq, the Hezbollah Brigades, and the Badr Corps, withdrew their troops from the front lines following the US intervention. The original offensive included 25,000 to 30,000 Shia militiamen.
Reuters
Other Shiite militias that remained alongside the Iraqi Army after the airstrikes were identified by the US as potential partners in the fight against ISIS. Those militias, which supposedly aren’t beholden to Iran, number at least 4,500 fighters.
According to the WSJ, the US deliberately used airstrikes in Tikrit "to drive a wedge between Iran and Iraq" while becoming more effective partners with Iraqi-led Shiite militias.
The Iranian-backed militias, such as the Badr Corps, directly fought against the US during the occupation of Iraq and were responsible for countless deaths linked to improvised explosive devices. The groups have also committed retribution atrocities against Sunni civilians since the ISIS offensive, such as the burning of villages and the purposeful looting of homes.
US officials: Iran's militias just failed in Iraq because they can't shoot or coordinate
- JEREMY BENDER
- APR. 2, 2015, 10:43 AM
- 10,942
- 14
After a nearly month-long assault on the Iraqi city of Tikrit by the Iraqi military and Iranian-backed Shiite militias, the city was finally retaken from ISIS.
Recapturing Saddam Hussein's hometown was expected to only take a few days, but ISIS (aka Islamic State, or Daesh) laid a bunch of improvised explosive devices(IEDs) that shredded Shia militiamen.
And there was another problem, according to US officials: The Iranian-backed militias couldn't shoot very well.
"U.S. officials assessed that the Iranian-backed assault on Tikrit was failing because of the inaccuracy of Iranian artillery and the failure of the Tehran-backed militias to respond to orders or coordinate their movements with the Iraqi security forces nominally leading the fight," The Wall Street Journal reports.
Tikrit was only successfully retaken once the US started conducting airstrikes against the militants, which effectively sidelined the Shiite militias. Three militias explicitly linked to Iran, the Asaib Ahl al Haq, the Hezbollah Brigades, and the Badr Corps, withdrew their troops from the front lines following the US intervention. The original offensive included 25,000 to 30,000 Shia militiamen.
Other Shiite militias that remained alongside the Iraqi Army after the airstrikes were identified by the US as potential partners in the fight against ISIS. Those militias, which supposedly aren’t beholden to Iran, number at least 4,500 fighters.
According to the WSJ, the US deliberately used airstrikes in Tikrit "to drive a wedge between Iran and Iraq" while becoming more effective partners with Iraqi-led Shiite militias.
The Iranian-backed militias, such as the Badr Corps, directly fought against the US during the occupation of Iraq and were responsible for countless deaths linked to improvised explosive devices. The groups have also committed retribution atrocities against Sunni civilians since the ISIS offensive, such as the burning of villages and the purposeful looting of homes.
I've posted the most sheer informatjon about the history of the Iranian nuclear program than anyone ...but I'm lost.
fukk outta here asswipe
You're sanctioned don't talk to me