Independent restaurants are being crushed by the labor shortage. They're raising prices, cutting ope

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
146,456
Reputation
26,234
Daps
491,060
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
If poverty wages are the only way for your business to prosper then you shouldn't have a business. I'm not shedding any tears over these places closing and neither should anyone else.

gospel.

been saying this shyt for the longest.

now others are opening up their wallets with higher wages and people are going there.

Ante up or find a new hustle.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
146,456
Reputation
26,234
Daps
491,060
Reppin
TYRONE GA!

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Bushed
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,100
Reputation
-2,418
Daps
16,729
Speaking to capitalism like it’s a set, binary, “you have it or don’t” doesn’t work. Where would you draw the line between capitalism and socialism? Capitalism and corporatism? I’d argue we’re closer to corporatism with “true capitalism” left for small businesses.

Capitalism as we’ve practiced it is clearly leading to society unraveling and the planet being destroyed. Point is the current system clearly isn’t working, and we have alternatives. This black and white approach to capitalism is just legacy red scare, 80s bullshyt.

Alotta words there breh. Put it simply for everyone. Going by the definition, what problem do you have with capitalism? You have a problem with private owners being in control of industry and trade? If so then WHO should be in control?

You play 2k the Basketball game? In it it has sliders to where you can make one side hit all the shots. Make on side faster then the other. Stronger. Make it to where one side commits no fouls and the other commits all the fouls. The other side is slower. Weaker. Misses every shot they take. That’s all they did with capitalism. They rigged it in their favor. But by definition? There’s nothing wrong with it. If there is, explain by picking at the definition.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
146,456
Reputation
26,234
Daps
491,060
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Taco Crush in McKinney, Texas, closed down in September after being left with just three kitchen workers. Owner Paul Horton told Insider that larger companies had poached some of his staff with offers of much higher wages or benefits.

and guess who these same business owners vote to put in office...

small businesses have no business supporting people and policies that benefit the bigger corporations who now are turning around and flipping the game of capitalism on them.

socialism is only a problem until you need it.... :mjpls:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Bushed
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,100
Reputation
-2,418
Daps
16,729
How is bailing out huge corporations who’s policies and bad decisions led them to bankruptcy capitalism?

That’s quite literally not how it works:pachaha:
Yes they rig capitalism to their favor. I can rig a game to where I win all or most of the time. That doesn’t mean the game itself is bad. So you go pick apart the definition and explain why industry and trade should NOT be in the hands of private owners.

That’s why I bring the definition because it always runs the “capitulizm is bahd!! :damn: folks
 

Michael's Black Son

Blanket Jackson
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
51,490
Reputation
15,054
Daps
227,738
Reppin
New York City & Neverland Ranch
:manny: Convert your restaurant to a food truck. That seems to be the latest trend.

:manny: Corona exacerbated a problem that was brewing and the economy is now structurally changing.

exactly.

Get two trucks. One that stays in a popular area and one that acts as a pop up and is in different areas. Get a small SUV that just does supply runs to each truck and make the food available on Uber eats/doordash

fukk paying crazy rent when that $ could go into trucks and permits. If business slows down, park the truck in a garage and not stress about rent.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
146,456
Reputation
26,234
Daps
491,060
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
exactly.

Get two trucks. One that stays in a popular area and one that acts as a pop up and is in different areas. Get a small SUV that just does supply runs to each truck and make the food available on Uber eats/doordash

fukk paying crazy rent when that $ could go into trucks and permits. If business slows down, park the truck in a garage and not stress about rent.

Church, get creative.
 

Reality

Make your own luck.
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
7,187
Reputation
4,184
Daps
38,345
Reppin
NULL
Alotta words there breh. Put it simply for everyone. Going by the definition, what problem do you have with capitalism? You have a problem with private owners being in control of industry and trade? If so then WHO should be in control?

You play 2k the Basketball game? In it it has sliders to where you can make one side hit all the shots. Make on side faster then the other. Stronger. Make it to where one side commits no fouls and the other commits all the fouls. The other side is slower. Weaker. Misses every shot they take. That’s all they did with capitalism. They rigged it in their favor. But by definition? There’s nothing wrong with it. If there is, explain by picking at the definition.

My problem with capitalism is that, as practiced today, it is failing to create shared prosperity, leading to the unraveling of society and interpersonal connections, and actively leading to the earth being uninhabitable for humankind. Is that simple enough?

Private industry should be in control in some aspects of trade and production, but not in others. Capitalism is a means to an end: SHARED prosperity, not just prosperity, and where it fails at this objective, government should step in. Case in point, health care and child care are places where government should play more of a role. Your approach of "who controls industry and trade" is way too simple of a question.

For example, I don't think the government should wield negotiating power for something like hair loss pills to drive down their prices, but I do think it should be throwing its weight around for something like insulin. Does that make me a capitalist? Socialist? Communist?

If we're picking up on the slider analogy, a capitalism slider that's closer to socialism than corporatism would do way better in creating SHARED prosperity for people. Look at the Nordic countries (socialist countries that have better outcomes in health and happiness for its people). People say "we can't have what they have", but the only legit reason is racism. Not the size of the US or any of that other bullshyt that gets spit out.

At the very least, we need socialism where profit motives are in contrast with people's ability to, idk, not die or go completely bankrupt due to a temporary lapse in employment. Or to not have to have a herculean effort to turn your family's socioeconomic status around ("Find a way to work 3 jobs and not have your kid fall behind with school or become a drug dealer trying to support you - just believe in yourself!!!").

None of the benefits of capitalism that most human on this planet enjoy can actually enjoy get destroyed by having medicare for all, a single bloc negotiatior for drugs you need to stay alive, etc. We're literally talking about adjustments that would have some billionaires only able to make 20 generations of their family millionaires instead of 30, lead to smaller yachts, less private space flights, etc.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Messages
15,508
Reputation
2,116
Daps
58,214
Yes they rig capitalism to their favor. I can rig a game to where I win all or most of the time. That doesn’t mean the game itself is bad. So you go pick apart the definition and explain why industry and trade should NOT be in the hands of private owners.

That’s why I bring the definition because it always runs the “capitulizm is bahd!! :damn: folks

I guess I'm not the only one with an agenda.. :mjlol:

Also I'm not sure why you'd expect a socialist to be on board with any economic system that requires there to be human suffering whether in your country or another (or in americans case both) in order for it to be successful
 
Last edited:
Top