A few things....
1. First off, season 2 is
far less realistic than season 1. Before people argue with me, Howard Gordon the co-creator of the series admitted that they focused less on realism in season 2 and hopefully fans would forgive them as long as they were entertained.
2. The show is is getting kinda "24"-ish.
Again, before people say
"Fred, what the fukk?" Alex Gansa (another co-creator) admitted that certain shyt like the tailor shop ambush was "a bit too much like 24".
3. Neither of these things bother me, but I see people complaining about them and they are valid complaints. Those people ain't crazy or just looking to nitpick the show to death.
4. There is some shyt that
does bother me:
Dana was a decent likeable character in season 1, in season 2 she's a WOAT contender. Basically for no reason. I was hoping Brody would choke slam her into the spilt milk in that one scene.
Abu Nazir turning into a random terrorist goon. Not feeling that shyt at all, but that's personal preference. If they introduce a new "big bad" ok cool, but again, that's "24" territory.
Carrie. She's getting so crazy I can't even relate to her as the protagonist. She's just wilding the fukk out in half the scenes she's in. And that Galvez shyt was crazy foul. And Quinn was like
"he is a Muslim" like she broke the whole case wide open.
Brody. I'm gonna reserve judgement on him until I see how the finale plays out. But I don't see how they can stretch him out into another season. Hopefully they'll surprise me.
5. None of these things are deal breakers, the show is still entertaining. I just prefer it being a slower paced psychological thriller like season 1, but
that shyt seems over now.
Even if the show falls off horrifically I'd still browse the thr ead for Obarth's write-up. Also "PAWGs with Dragons" would be the GOAT show.
Fred.