don’t give a fukk because they don’t give a fukk…
At the bolded part - Correction, Africa is 4 times the size of the contiguous USA.Good point . People treat a continent 5 times the size of the continental US like a monolith .
However, I'm not sure that unity is impossible. You could've said the same thing about Asia prior to Khan and his demonic offspring. They got literally everything from the Pacific ocean to the Indian subcontinent and all the way to fcking Armenia under one family flag. That's an area bigger than subshaharan Africa with everything from deserts to jungles to mountainsides included. At its height, khan's Asia had spies embedded as far as Venice Italy because of their need and ease of expansion.
I mean seriously look at this disgustingly large map of their empire. And they would've taken Laos/Cambodia too if Kublai Khan didn't die of diabetes and alcohol...
So I certainly can't discount an African equivalent. But my concern is that it definitely wouldn't be a peaceful process. People love to glaze over the human cost of "unity" . Rarely is it a peaceful process . Instead of noble leaders, "unity" normally involves thugs imposssing thier will on others. Everybody from the US, to the Russian federation , to the PRC, to India ,to the Soviet union, to the British isles had to basically massacre their populations to get that unity. So I think Africa would be better off without it for the sake of sparing black lives.
Exactly.And over time as those white kids mix with other white people the future UK white population will have an almost universal, though probably small, signature of African ancestry, much like Afrikaners almost all have some Khoi ancestry.
I partially agree. While Western Euro tech wasn't all that during the 16th to 18th century, by the time it got to the 'Scramble for Africa' Western Euro tech was clearly ahead of damn near every African polity. Western Euro had mounted machine guns (vickers, maxim, etc) steam powered ships, steam trains, massive factories (The Industrial Revolution), quinone (anti-malaria), etc. Most African polities did not. I mean sure, Western Euros stirred shyt within Africa and made alliances with multiple African polities but every empire is partially formed from alliances.That's the point I was trying to get across in some ways. The colonization of Africa had little to do with euro superiority but rather taking advantage of the disagreements between tribes and kingdoms, similar to other groups.
This is what we truly need to understand. The ONLY difference between them and us was technology. My problem is that China, India, Pakistan learned and developed a nuclear weapon? Us? Please. We barely manufacture own own ammunitions let alone actual munitions. This is my problem with us. Afrika lost because they didn't take their proceeds from slavery and industrialize. Now we as a global people are playing catch-up, if we're playing at all. It's chess, not checkers. This is why I am a zealot of brothers like AMOS Wilson AND Khalid Muhammad, PEACE BE UPON THEM. This is was infuriates me about South Afrika. You HAVE the guns and the people but don't have the mindset.I partially agree. While Western Euro tech wasn't all that during the 16th to 18th century, by the time it got to the 'Scramble for Africa' Western Euro tech was clearly ahead of damn near every African polity. Western Euro had mounted machine guns (vickers, maxim, etc) steam powered ships, steam trains, massive factories (The Industrial Revolution), quinone (anti-malaria), etc. Most African polities did not. I mean sure, Western Euros stirred shyt within Africa and made alliances with multiple African polities but every empire is partially formed from alliances.
There's nothing wrong in losing to militaries and polities that have superior tech. In fact, the continent of Africa was probably the hardest for the Western Euros to conquer.
I don’t care and don’t give a fukk my only Job is to make sure my descendants are the ones on top of this shyt unlike you defeatists in this thread I’ll be dead.
Also if you’re a Black American playing Race purity politics
The US Black population is too big and too segregated to completely mix like Brazil. On the other hand, absent immigration, the Black communities in the UK and Canada (esp. outside Ontario) are on their way to assimilation. Those communities largely never got past reppin' their parents' home countries and never formed a cohesive community. The Caribbean descent will go first and the African descent may hang on for an extra generation or two.
Africans you ain’t worried about lolAfricans I'm not too worried about.
But these diaspora negroes especially the ones in america are about to be non existence or at best a mulatto racial group
Africans you ain’t worried about lol
First of all Africans are not black
Second of all, you should worry about africa because they’ll likely still be getting pimped and colonized 100 years from now
I've been told them same by my UK bruv. Any French brothers here wanna chime in?As a Caribbean descent person in the UK, I've already accepted this
Reckon the Africans will hold on more than a generation though, Caribbean community is pretty much done.
Calm down guy and re-read my op.Black people are not marrying out or having children out in any large capacity so what the fukk are y'all talking about its a fukking obsession.