If Dallas wins a title will Kyrie be put on the Mt Rushmore of 1B/Robin players alongside Pippen…..?

RedBull

All Star
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,992
Reputation
704
Daps
10,767
Reppin
On KRS One's nose, eating sunflower seeds.
That was due to market and attention, not ability.

Last full year with Grizzlies: 20.8 ppg, 9.8 rpg, 3.4 apg, 2.1 bpg, 54% shooting - no all-star, no All-NBA
First full year with Lakers: 18.9 ppg, 9.6 rpg, 3.5 apg, 1.9 bpg, 57% shooting - All-Star and All-NBA (11th in league in All-NBA votes)

Next two years he put up the same stats yet moved his way up to 2nd-team All-NBA (9th in league in All-NBA votes). And then since his brand was set, when he moved to Chicago he continued to grab additional All-Star and All-NBA selections even though his actual #'s and role dropped even further from what he was doing in Memphis.
Agreed, but it was mainly due to his teams not being a factor. He don’t lead his teams anywhere.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,890
Reppin
the ether
I literally posted Kyrie and LeBrons ppg for the whole duration of the 2016 post season. LBJ only averaged 2 more points than Kyrie while Kobe averaged 10 more ppg than Pau during their 2010 title run. It’s not comparable. Kobe carried a larger scoring load relative to his running mate than LeBron did with Kyrie.


Kobe is a score-first player while Pau was an all-around (offense, defense, rebounding) sidekick.
Bron is an all-around player while Kyrie was a score-first sidekick.

Trying to compare their contributions on PPG alone is ridiculous. In cases where they both have competent teammates, of course Kobe is going to have a larger scoring gap compared to his teammates than Bron will. Kobe is a scoring guard and one of the biggest volume shooters of all time while Bron is a point guard mentality in a forward's body. Bron "could" dominate as a scorer when he had to (against the best competition when his teammates couldn't do it), while Kobe dominated as a scorer whenever he could, which meant mostly when it was easiest for him to do so (in easy series against outmatched competition).

This is basically the entire thread - keeps deteriorating to PPG alone as if that's literally the only role.
 

Biscayne

Ocean air
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
33,718
Reputation
5,524
Daps
102,076
Reppin
Cruisin’
The 4 best FG% seasons of Wade's career were 2011-2014, even though he was injured a lot of that time. Some of the best team defense of his career was during that period too (when the injuries weren't limiting him).

The 2 best FG% seasons of Bosh's career were 2013 and 2014. And he also played the best defense of his career and developed 3pt range for the first time.

Haters focus on their PPG dropping...but Bron's PPG drop too, that was a given when all 3 played together cause they had to share the rock. No one ever mentions that Pau, Odom, and Artest's PPG dropped as well when they had to play together alongside Kobe.







Yeah, I'd say Duncan and LeBron both get that cred. Both of them were competitive when healthy for ~15 years of their "primes" no matter what their roster looked like. Magic, Russell, and Bird are all in the "always had a stacked team" category, none of the three really even had a year where their roster was even mediocre, much less "bad", until they were washed.

Kareem, Wilt, Shaq, MJ, Kobe, Hakeem all had some just straight uncompetitive years in their playing primes because their roster just wasn't good enough.
He saying Wades 2006 run was a one off season is funny, considering LeBron was still able to play with Hall Of Fame level talent after Miami. He keeps ignoring that wade was playing with below average talent on the Heat teams that didn’t have success. :mjlol:
 

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,160
Reputation
985
Daps
44,237
That was due to market and attention, not ability.

Last full year with Grizzlies: 20.8 ppg, 9.8 rpg, 3.4 apg, 2.1 bpg, 54% shooting - no all-star, no All-NBA
First full year with Lakers: 18.9 ppg, 9.6 rpg, 3.5 apg, 1.9 bpg, 57% shooting - All-Star and All-NBA (11th in league in All-NBA votes)

Next two years he put up the same stats yet moved his way up to 2nd-team All-NBA (9th in league in All-NBA votes). And then since his brand was set, when he moved to Chicago he continued to grab additional All-Star and All-NBA selections even though his actual #'s and role dropped even further from what he was doing in Memphis.
Social media didn't exist back then and not a lot of people had league pass. My roommate at the time had it. So I watched quite a few Grizzlies games. Pau was definitely a top 15 player in the league at the very least.
 

Biscayne

Ocean air
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
33,718
Reputation
5,524
Daps
102,076
Reppin
Cruisin’
Kobe is a score-first player while Pau was an all-around (offense, defense, rebounding) sidekick.
Bron is an all-around player while Kyrie was a score-first sidekick.

Trying to compare their contributions on PPG alone is ridiculous. In cases where they both have competent teammates, of course Kobe is going to have a larger scoring gap compared to his teammates than Bron will. Kobe is a scoring guard and one of the biggest volume shooters of all time while Bron is a point guard mentality in a forward's body.

This is basically the entire thread - keeps deteriorating to PPG alone as if that's literally the only role.
Pau is a big. Even in the 2010s you still had bigs leading teams in offensive production. Hell, the lakers just the year before went up against Dwight in his prime on that Magic team.
 

Phantum

The Charisma of the Streets
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
6,924
Reputation
1,326
Daps
33,639
If you need a bucket right now, Kyrie is the best. :hubie:


Not saying all time but who's in the league at this moment.
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,683
Reputation
6,293
Daps
45,485
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
I literally posted Kyrie and LeBrons ppg for the whole duration of the 2016 post season. LBJ only averaged 2 more points than Kyrie while Kobe averaged 10 more ppg than Pau during their 2010 title run. It’s not comparable. Kobe carried a larger scoring load relative to his running mate than LeBron did with Kyrie. The sample size I used between the two duos was both for a whole post season. Both of the post seasons in which they both won titles. :manny:
Literally none if the advanced metrics, no other traditional metric, favor '16 Kyrie, other than PPG. Stop it. We know he's a 2. The duration of that postseason, there wasn't a single time you thought he wasn't a 2 on a team with Peak LeBron James...

They played together for 3 years. Kyrie was always a 2...

The question isn't who played with the most talent, re:Wade. The topic was "got their most success with LeBron", and Wade always gets omitted even though there is ZERO argument that his 12-year non-LeBron career, was more successful than his 4-year LeBron career...

Wade was a 1 better suited as a 2. As a 1, take away the '06 run, this nikka career was very, very average. You lucky he has '06 or we'd be talking about fam like we talk about Melo ..
He saying Wades 2006 run was a one off season is funny, considering LeBron was still able to play with Hall Of Fame level talent after Miami. He keeps ignoring that wade was playing with below average talent on the Heat teams that didn’t have success. :mjlol:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,890
Reppin
the ether
Agreed, but it was mainly due to his teams not being a factor. He don’t lead his teams anywhere.


How many wins did you expect him to get in the ultra-competitive Spurs-Mavs-Suns-Timberwolves-Kings West with those starting lineups?

2004

Jason Williams
Mike Miller
James Posey
Lorenzen Wright

23yo Pau leads them to 50 wins! 5 more than the Yao-Francis-Mobley Rockets, just 5 less than the Webber-Bibby-Peja Kings, 6 less than the Shaq-Kobe-Malone-Payton Lakers. But they got fukked over with a 1st-round matchup against the defending champ Spurs.



2005

Jason Williams
Mike Miller
Shane Battier
Lorenzen Wright

45 wins. 11 more than the Kobe-Odom-Butler Lakers, 1 more than the Garnett-Sprewell-Wally-Casssell Timberwolves, 5 fewer than the Webber-Bibby-Peja Kings. But again, they had to face by far the best Suns team of the 2000s (Nash, Amare, Iso Joe, Marion, Quentin) in the 1st round.



2006

Chucky Atkins
35yo Eddie Jones
Shane Battier
Lorenzen Wright

49 wins. 5 more than the Carmelo-Camby-Martin-Miller Nuggets, 4 more than the Kobe-Odom Lakers, 5 less than the Nash-Marion-Diaw Suns. Unfortunately, they had to go up against a Dirk Mavs team in the 1st round that nearly ended up winning the title that year.




Those Grizzlies overachieved three years in a row. They got terrible 1st-round matchups (the Spurs, Suns, and Mavs with great rosters), but even so, they won way more regular season games than anyone should have expected those sorts of rosters to win.
 

Biscayne

Ocean air
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
33,718
Reputation
5,524
Daps
102,076
Reppin
Cruisin’
Literally none if the advanced metrics, no other traditional metric, favor '16 Kyrie, other than PPG. Stop it. We know he's a 2. The duration of that postseason, there wasn't a single time you thought he wasn't a 2 on a team with Peak LeBron James...

They played together for 3 years. Kyrie was always a 2...

The question isn't who played with the most talent, re:Wade. The topic was "got their most success with LeBron", and Wade always gets omitted even though there is ZERO argument that his 12-year non-LeBron career, was more successful than his 4-year LeBron career...

Wade was a 1 better suited as a 2. As a 1, take away the '06 run, this nikka career was very, very average. You lucky he has '06 or we'd be talking about fam like we talk about Melo ..
Wade became a great 2, because he and LeBron did too many of the same things. Neither wade or LeBron were great shooters. Wade naturally was a 1, because his scoring numbers, assists numbers, etc, were always leading to wins. They weren’t empty stat fluff. Wade becoming a 2, was because his game and LeBrons game required one of them to be the ball dominant player in Spo’s system. The growing pains came from Wade NATURALLY not knowing how to become the sidekick, after carrying Miami for so long. You can’t take away the 2006 title no matter what. Wade as a one got them a title before Bron. Wade was a good enough scorer, playmaker and defender to be a floor raiser. :manny:

What lucky voodoo happened in 2006 that allowed Wade to lead his team in most metrics to the finals and a title? He’s just a natural 2 who got lucky?
 

RedBull

All Star
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,992
Reputation
704
Daps
10,767
Reppin
On KRS One's nose, eating sunflower seeds.
How many wins did you expect him to get in the ultra-competitive Spurs-Mavs-Suns-Timberwolves-Kings West with those starting lineups?

2004

Jason Williams
Mike Miller
James Posey
Lorenzen Wright

23yo Pau leads them to 50 wins! 5 more than the Yao-Francis-Mobley Rockets, just 5 less than the Webber-Bibby-Peja Kings, 6 less than the Shaq-Kobe-Malone-Payton Lakers. But they got fukked over with a 1st-round matchup against the defending champ Spurs.



2005

Jason Williams
Mike Miller
Shane Battier
Lorenzen Wright

45 wins. 11 more than the Kobe-Odom-Butler Lakers, 1 more than the Garnett-Sprewell-Wally-Casssell Timberwolves, 5 fewer than the Webber-Bibby-Peja Kings. But again, they had to face by far the best Suns team of the 2000s (Nash, Amare, Iso Joe, Marion, Quentin) in the 1st round.



2006

Chucky Atkins
35yo Eddie Jones
Shane Battier
Lorenzen Wright

49 wins. 5 more than the Carmelo-Camby-Martin-Miller Nuggets, 4 more than the Kobe-Odom Lakers, 5 less than the Nash-Marion-Diaw Suns. Unfortunately, they had to go up against a Dirk Mavs team in the 1st round that nearly ended up winning the title that year.




Those Grizzlies overachieved three years in a row. They got terrible 1st-round matchups (the Spurs, Suns, and Mavs with great rosters), but even so, they won way more regular season games than anyone should have expected those sorts of rosters to win.
:wtf:Breh. I didn’t expect anything, just adding to what you said. First words, “agreed”.
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,683
Reputation
6,293
Daps
45,485
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
Wade became a great 2, because he and LeBron did too many of the same things. Neither wade or LeBron were great shooters. Wade naturally was a 1, because his scoring numbers, assists numbers, etc, were always leading to wins. They weren’t empty stat fluff. Wade becoming a 2, was because his game and LeBrons game required one of them to be the ball dominant player in Spo’s system. The growing pains came from Wade NATURALLY not knowing how to become the sidekick, after carrying Miami for so long. You can’t take away the 2006 title no matter what. Wade as a one got them a title before Bron. Wade was a good enough scorer, playmaker and defender to be a floor raiser. :manny:

What lucky voodoo happened in 2006 that allowed Wade to lead his team in most metrics to the finals and a title? He’s just a natural 2 who got lucky?
I clearly said Wade was a 1. But the most success he saw in his career was as a 2, to LeBron...
 

Uno

Superstar
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
7,137
Reputation
251
Daps
24,190
Pau was a career loser before he got to the Lakers. Now he's been elevated to a Laker Legend, and I think rightfully so. But compare his career trajectory to Love and Bosh, they were both better players before teaming up with a certain someone :hubie:

Before Pau got to help 7-55 Kobe, Kobe lost to the pistons that had no stars. Then he is missed the playoffs, got eliminated in first round, raped white women(allegedly), and cried and to be traded.
 
Top