Hollywood stars raise $60 million for US taxpayer-funded Israeli military

[Hannibal Fox]

Why's that? He's not wrong, it is a problem. Why does this government care this much about a foreign nation? This country is already in debt yet we still send them money? If you criticize our government and it's obsession with Israel then you're looked at as evil and Midas we'll be labeled a nazi?

Is It Real is just a colony of anglophiles to me breh, them receiving all that dough doesn't surprise me and it shouldn't surprise you!

 

[Koichos]

Those cacs are not the real Jews.

The literature demonstrates otherwise.

They're Indo european cave devil's from the steppes and Caucasus mountains

Except, such postulation crumbles under DNA analysis.

Not to mention, Ashkenazim and Palestinians are closer genetically than Ashkenazim and Russians.

 

[Family Lives Matter]

Are we really shocked
fukking devils
Where's the original source I'm not reading and believing everything posted on the internet.…

 

[ReadOneBookAWeek]

The literature demonstrates otherwise.


Except, such postulation crumbles under DNA analysis.

Not to mention, Ashkenazim and Palestinians are closer genetically than Ashkenazim and Russians.

Ever heard of the Yuehzi? Or the Wusun?

 

[Formerly Black Trash]

that same money could have went to slavery reparations.

Nah nah nah

 

[Koichos]

Ever heard of the Yuehzi? Or the Wusun?

I'm listening..

 

[Rarely-Wrong Liggins]

All these new Hitler lovers should thank their fearless leader for this. Jews would still be the "black people of Europe" (treatment wise) if it weren't for Hitler and the Holocaust. #HitlerDidSomethingWrong

 

[ReadOneBookAWeek]

I'm listening..

A 7th century commentary to the Hanshu by Yan Shigu says:
Among the barbarians in the Western Regions, the look of the Wusun is the most unusual. The present barbarians who have green eyes and red hair, and look like macaque monkeys, are the offspring of this people.

Initially, when only a few number of skulls from Wusun territory were known, the Wusun were recognized as a Caucasoid people with slight Mongoloid admixture.[Later, in a more thorough study by Soviet archaeologists of eighty-seven skulls of Zhetysu, the six skulls of the Wusun period were determined to be purely Caucasoid or close to it.

Yes Caucasians we're associates with the characteristics of monkeys centuries before they flipped it onto blacks. If you want to go down the historical trail of the Caucasian race I will lead you. There is plenty of historical documentation by many nations. Not speculative or theoretical science

 

[ReadOneBookAWeek]

Bronze plaque of a man of the Ordos Plateau, long held by the Xiongnu. 3–1st century BCE. British Museum. Otto J. Maenchen-Helfen notes that the statuette displays Caucasoid features.

After their previous overlords, the Yuezhi, migrated into Central Asia during the 2nd century BC, the Xiongnu became a dominant power on the steppes of north-east Central Asia, centred on an area known later as Mongolia

The Scythians, Xiongnu, Yuezhi, Wusun, Huns, Mongols & KHAZARS(modern day "Jews") are all the same or closely related nomadic tribes of the steppes and Caucasus mountains and they share the same barbarians lineage.

They are NOT the descendants of the tribe of judah nor any of the other 11 tribes of Israel. These are historical facts that have been proven and known in anthropology.

This is why the Caucasians claim everyones history but their own, theirs is nothing to be proud of.

Go and trace these Caucasian tribes before you post anymore speculative science

 

[Koichos]

The Scythians, Xiongnu, Yuezhi, Wusun, Huns, Mongols & KHAZARS(modern day "Jews") all the same nomadic tribes of the steppes and Caucasus mountains and share the same barbarians lineage.

They are NOT the descendants of the tribe of judah nor any of the other 11 tribes of Israel. These are historical facts that have been proven and known in worldwide anthropology.

This is why the Caucasians claim everyones history but their own, theirs is nothing to be proud of.

The Khazar theory has been confuted by more than two dozen geneticists.

Spoiler

(Behar et al. 2013)

Population-genetic structure and Ashkenazi Jews
Our sample set representing the geographic region of the Khazar Khaganate can be split into three subsets (Figure 1): populations from the South Caucasus region (Abkhasian, Armenian, Azeri, Georgian), populations from the North Caucasus region (Adygei, Balkar, Chechen, Kabardin, Kumyk, Lezgin, Nogai, North Ossetian, Tabasaran), and populations from the Volga region in the most northerly reaches of the Khazar expanse (Chuvash, Tatar). Under the hypothesis of a strong Khazar contribution to the Ashkenazi Jewish population, we might have expected in PCA (Figure 2a) to see the Ashkenazi Jews placed in tight overlap with populations representing the Khazar region. Instead, considering the samples of the Khazar region together with the Ashkenazi Jewish samples, the Ashkenazi Jews were positioned alongside other Jewish samples, between Southern Europeans and samples from the Middle East, and they did not substantially overlap populations from the Khazar region. The three subsets of the Khazar region —South Caucasus, North Caucasus, and Volga region—are themselves differentiated in PCA, with the Volga and North Caucasus populations, which approximate the Khazar region more closely than do the South Caucasus populations, positioned most distantly from Ashkenazi Jews.

The spatial ancestry analysis confirms and sharpens the lack of evidence for the Khazar hypothesis observed in PCA, placing the Ashkenazi Jewish sample in close proximity to Italian Jews, North African Jews, Sephardi Jews, and Mediterranean non-Jewish populations such as Cypriots and Italians. Of the three sub-regions of the Khazar Khaganate, the two northern groups are again distant from the Ashkenazi Jews. Among the four South Caucasus populations, the Armenian and Azeri populations in particular lie closer to non-Jewish Middle Eastern populations, including Druze, Iranians, Kurds, and Lebanese, than to Ashkenazi Jews. Strikingly, the Ashkenazi Jewish population shows no overlap even with the South Caucasus groups, and moreover, it is apparent that the South Caucasus Armenian population is genetically closer to Middle Eastern Jewish populations than to Ashkenazi Jews.

For the Jewish populations included in a large group containing Ashkenazi, North African, and Sephardi Jews, most of the populations with the highest similarity of cluster membership coefficients are other Jewish populations. Considering ten Jewish populations included in the group (Algerian, Belmonte, Bulgarian, Eastern Ashkenazi, Italian, Libyan, Moroccan, Tunisian, Turkish, Western Ashkenazi), the non-Jewish populations that appear on lists of populations with the most similar cluster memberships are French Basques, Bulgarians, Cypriots, Druze, Greeks, Italians from Abruzzo, Bergamo, Sicily, and Tuscany, Jordanians, Lebanese, Palestinians, Samaritans, Italians from Sardinia, Spanish, and Syrians. Notably absent from this list is the inclusion of any of the populations from the Khazar region.

In summary, in this most comprehensive study to date, we have examined the three potential sources for contemporary Ashkenazi Jews, using a new sample set that covers the full extent of the Khazar realm of the 6th to 10th centuries. Analysis of this large data set does not change and in fact reinforces the conclusions of multiple past studies, including ours and those of other groups (Atzmon and others, 2010; Bauchet and others, 2007; Behar and others, 2010; Campbell and others, 2012; Guha and others, 2012; Haber and others, 2013; Henn and others, 2012; Kopelman and others, 2009; Seldin and others, 2006; Tian and others, 2008). We confirm the notion that the Ashkenazi, North African, and Sephardi Jews share substantial genetic ancestry and that they derive it from Middle Eastern and European populations, with no indication of a detectable Khazar contribution to their genetic origins.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Wexler, 2014)

The R1a-Y2619 Ashkenazi Levite cluster does not have origins in Khazaria. Not only did that line have origins in the Middle East as of 3,000 years ago, but the line was Jewish (and Levite) as of 1,750 years ago, more than 500 years before the Khazars (or, in some accounts, Khazarian royalty) are said to have converted to Judaism.

DNA analysis on Khazarian remains has begun; their haplotypes are unrelated to Jewish haplotypes of haplogroup R1a.

Spoiler

(Faleeva, 2017)

To understand a biological tribal affiliation (in terms of Y-chromosomal haplogroups, subclades, and haplotypes) of two excavated Khazar bone remains in the lower Don region in the south of Russia, we have extracted and analyzed their DNA and showed that both belonged to haplogroup R1a and its subclade Z93. The pattern could be considered typically “Turkic”, and not a Jewish DNA lineage. Their haplotypes were also identified and reported here . . . according to DNA genealogy data none of the two ancient Khazars belonged to the Jewish YDNA (Y-chromosomal DNA) lineage . . . The haplotypes indicate that both Khazars were unrelated to each other in a sense that their common ancestor lived as long as 1500 - 2500 years earlier than them, in the middle of the II millennium BC—beginning of the I millennium BC, during typically Scythian times or somewhat earlier. Their haplotypes are unrelated to well-known Jewish haplotypes of haplogroup R1a.

 

[ThrobbingHood]

 

[ReadOneBookAWeek]

The Khazar theory has been confuted by more than two dozen geneticists.

Spoiler

(Behar et al. 2013)





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Wexler, 2014)

DNA analysis on Khazarian remains has begun; their haplotypes are unrelated to Jewish haplotypes of haplogroup R1a.

Spoiler

(Faleeva, 2017)

I'm not going by speculative science. I'm going by documented, VERIFIABLE history and anthropology.

The KHAZARS are nomadic Turks from the Eurasian steppes and Caucasus mountains. They are not descendants of Jacob's 12 sons, nor is there ANY VERIFIABLE historical evidence to back your claims. However there is a MOUNTAIN of VERIFIABLE historical evidence to back mine

 

[ThrobbingHood]

These threads always brings out the lurkers for some reason.

 

[Koichos]

I'm not going by speculative science. I'm going by documented history and anthropology.

The KHAZARS are nomadic Turks from the Eurasian steppes and Caucasus mountains. They are not descendants of Jacob's 12 sons, nor is there ANY historical evidence to back your claims. However there is a MOUNTAIN of historical evidence to back mine

Correct, the Khazars were nomadic Turks; unfortunately, they no longer exist.

 

[ReadOneBookAWeek]

Correct, the Khazars were nomadic Turks; unfortunately, they no longer exist.

They migrated to eastern europe centuries after converting to Judaism. Around the same times their cousins the Mongols and Turks were invading Europe and the middle east.

The crusades were launched against the Mongols and Turks of whom some converted to Islam. It had nothing to do with Islam vs christianity. It was a religious crusade against a RACE of people

Are you familiar with the Gates of Alexander?

The Gates of Alexander was a legendary barrier supposedly built by Alexander the Great in the Caucasus to keep the uncivilized barbarians of the north (typically associated with Gog and Magog from invading the land to the south. The gates were a popular subject in medieval travel literature, starting with the Alexander Romance in a version from perhaps the 6th century.

Josephus, a Jewish historian in the 1st century, is known to have written of Alexander's gates, designed to be a barrier against the Scythians. According to this historian, the people whom the Greeks called Scythians were known (among the Jews) as Magogites, descendants of Magog in the Hebrew Bible. These references occur in two different works. The Jewish War states that the iron gates Alexander erected were controlled by the king of Hyrcania (on the south edge of the Caspian), and allowing passage of the gates to the Alans (whom Josephus considered a Scythic tribe) resulted in the sack of Media

How about the Red Jews

Many pamphlets circulated interpreting such events as the rise of Turkish power in the context of the legendary Red Jews. Philipp Melanchthon (1497-1560), for example, claimed that the Ottoman Turks and Muslims were the Red Jews.

Kevin Alan Brook, among others, speculated, but could not conclusively prove, that the legend of the Red Jews was actually based on accounts of the Khazars (fl.7th century to the 10th century). Indeed, in his 9th-century Expositio in Matthaeum Evangelistam, Christian of Stavelot refers to the Khazars as Hunnic descendants of Gog and Magog, as well as having been "enclosed" by Alexander, but having since escaped,

Christian's writings have also attracted the interest of scholars of Jewish history. A tantalizing reference exists in Christian's work to the conversion of the Khazars to Judaism, believed to have occurred in the late eighth or early ninth centuries:
At the present time we know of no nation under the heavens where Christians do not live. For [Christians are even found] in the lands of Gog and Magog -- who are a Hunnic race and are called Gazari (Khazars) [they are] circumcised and observing all [the laws of] Judaism. The Bulgars, however, who are of the same seven tribes [as the Khazars], are now becoming baptized [into Christianity].[3]