You didn’t read the article.
The time line is a progressive timeline, this is hard to understand. The timeline moves progressively and Asians improve progressively because of factors listed in the article. There is no jumping around, read the article.
I took 3 quotes from the fukking article. even edited inside them and this dumbass tells me I didn't read it.
Way to set the tone, you've already told me a lot about how you think.
Your theory has no research. This article had research and peer analysis from several decades. Jobs were already mentioned in the article, a college educated Asian was likely to end up as a food washer.
Jobs weren't mentioned. You didn't read the article.
Every piece of data in the article references median household income. Read the article. No data for overall employment nor anything tracking hiring discrimination.
Median household income is too broad of a figure to make solid deductions off. It doesn't speak to the kind of career the house earner has, the makeup of the family, who is the breadwinner and their circumstances etc. (2 parent house income vs single parent household income)
Over time, government propaganda created an acceptable environment for whites to socially and economically be less racist against Asians.
There is no proof in either the original article nor the paper the article was based on that solidly proves this. Hell the only evidence of it is a sentence from a newspaper here, a snippet from an essay there.....The point of propaganda is for it to be widespread.
I mean they were still doing racist movies in yellowface during the 60s and beyond.
The propaganda element is more so racists at the time weaponizing asian progress as an act of spite toward the black civil rights movement. Simple as that.
Your argument that Asians created their own societies in America, skips over the fact that whites were burning down successful Chinatowns like they were burning down successful black communities where they felt jealous economically. Many Asians were lynched.
Where did I make that argument?
You didn't read my post. You didn't read the article. Read the article. Read my post.
Read the article, Asians didn’t change much over time, white people’s racism towards them is what changed. That was lead by government propaganda and was effective.
Most people will take the research of Ivy League educated Asians on this topic more seriously than the hypotheticals of a message board poster
Is this the best example of "appeal to authority" fallacy on the internet?
CTFUUUUU @ ASIAN being the authority. Not [asian] historian, not [asian] professor.
Just asian. Nothing on the article said he was Ivy League but since he's asian I guess he's gotta be
"An asian told me this, it must be 1000% correct" ass nikka. This isn't a peer reviewed study, it's a fukkin opinion piece lmao. Dude is a journalist
Yo this really funny.
I needed that.
Don't talk to me until you understand the shyt you're quoting well enough to defend it without going "b-b-but I quoted an asian, this must be true!!"