what am i supposed to dispute? my refusal to support my own?You didn't really dispute what he said though
what am i supposed to dispute? my refusal to support my own?You didn't really dispute what he said though
what am i supposed to dispute? my refusal to support my own?
You have the same skeptical attitude when questioning the work of White scholars too right?hidden colours is shyt, the first had so much disinformation/ sattire
they got some questionable guests in the series
now fukkin nas
@HoopDreams94 I got an hour left and so far nothing about this documentary leads me to believe it blooooooooooooooows hidden colors out the water.
I'm putting this timer up, for the day of the neg approacheth. @observe tried to save you but he need to fall back. I'm doing God's work
You know how much time is spent on editing?
It's pretty hard to fathom a middle-aged man with a family editing his film, while operating a clothing line, doing lectures, and other projects. Ask some of the cats who film on here, and you'll see.
Guess I can't help him..lol..I just watched the first 24 mins just now to see if I could get thru it...I can't
I could watch that gif for hours...Furious cac season has returned
I'm saying doe, they're doing the work of the oppressor by implementing the musical element into the black psyche
For those who follow my posts, you know I spit nuttem but truth and I love my people. Best believe when I say hidden colours is bullshyt
this blows hidden colours out the fukkin water
NEGGED
This was an average documentary with average production value. It'd be one thing if you posted it as something else to watch, to insinuate this is some next level shyt ???
So let me make sure I understand this correctly. You're saying that the Moors who invaded Spain weren't black and the only "black Moors" were the ones who were used by the Arabs (aka the real Moors) to infiltrate West Africa only for monetary reasons?
I spit on Professor Mary Lefkowitz..... You probably like "who?"You have the same skeptical attitude when questioning the work of White scholars too right?
I expected a well rounded debate on Hidden Colours
I articulated myself well, presented my argument in a formal manner. And still have yet to recieve a constructive reply on the points I raised.
As is evident by the posts just on this page, I was confronted with opinions based on emotions/assumptions instead of facts.
Because I debunk and critique this documentary film, it does not I mean I do not acknowledge the positive aspects of the film.
And lastly, as I've already stated I enjoyed the film thoroughly.
But I shall not turn a blind eye to the flaws within. I've just dropped a fountain of knowledge on this page and NO ONE has battered an eye lid. That right there says it all.
I led you to the knowledge, but you refused to think.
hidden colours is shyt, the first had so much disinformation/ sattire
they got some questionable guests in the series
now fukkin nas
Your first statement in this thread was....
How do you expect a well rounded debate on something by starting off like that?
You were expecting emotional responses by coming in like that.
Hey, I had a couple of questions on some things content wise and technical wise (because I'm an editor and film guy).
But it wasn't enough for me to stand on the mountaintop and proclaim the series as shyt or erroneous because of a couple
of aspects.
Hell, I just saw "The Wolf of Wall Street" and I saw a few editing errors in that. However, it didn't take away from it being a really good and enjoyable film.
My point still stands. White people shyt doesn't get analyzed with a fine tooth combed like black folk shyt does.
Sure yall will point out some bullshyt from time to time. Good for you.
ALL things done by black people gets intensely audited. Fact.
Look at this thread. Some of yall are doing the most.