I'm reading through the document right now and there's a specific section I take issue with:
The authors state that pyramids in Mexico have no relation to the pyramids in Africa because by the time the Olmecs started building pyramids, Africans hadn't built a pyramid for thousands of years.
This is incorrect because pyramids were still being built in Africa. King Piye, Nubian emperor of Egypt built his pyramid in 721 B.C.
And even though there were pyramids built after that (pyramids at Nuri) I specifically bring up the pyramid at El-Kurru because I mentioned King Piye in my African history thread.
And on top of that, George Reisner, the archaeologist who excavated the tombs at El-Kurru, said this regarding the possibility of the Kings he found being black:
Which brings me back to my issue with anything pertaining to African history being told by non African people. There's far too many instances of straight lies told by so called scholars and archaeologists (Bayard Taylor, Karl Richard Lepsius, Jacques Joseph Champollion-Figeac, John Campbell, etc) for me to believe their claims. Even with insurmountable evidence, their belief of the inferiority of African people won't allow them to be honest when it comes to our history.
You said Van Sertima followers were stealing the history of people. Dude wrote a lot of books, so you might wanna be more specific instead of throwing out a blanket statement
And try bringing up the moors to a cac and you'll be faced with the same skepticism, disbelief, and anger about them being black.