Now I want you guys to watch this video. This is the lady that @
VictorVonDoom has an absolute problem with. Saying she has been discredited etc. and that she is crazy.... After looking at her, I want you to consider her opponent.
Now I think this should settle what we should think about these cac-ology scholars...who must co-sign 'Afrocentric' ideas before it becomes credible.
lol....Frances Cress Welsing is a fukking joke and she can't get any of her bullshyt published in any peer reviewed science journal because it doesn't hold up to the most basic, fundamental factual scrutiny. Her "melanin theory" shyt is so stupid an AP biology student could easily shred it to pieces like I did in a HL thread a while back.
Nobody in academia nor anybody with a decent modicum of education takes her nonsense seriously, and I doubt she even believes it herself. BLACK intellectuals do not take Frances Cress Welsing seriously. Michael Eric Dyson (who I don't even care for, but is obviously a highly educated and intelligent man) talked about how Welsing's work is a embarrassment because it's pseudoscience and a sad funhouse mirror image of white supremacist pseudoscience.
Y'all keep up presenting this false choice of "]black vs. cacology" or whatever you call it, but you're only displaying your failure to think logically because you don't seem to grasp that when it comes to nonsense like the crap Van Sertima and Welsing spew, it's only about facts, empirical data, and science vs. bullshyt.
I am amazed at how poor y'all are at formulating arguments as much as I amazed as the internet and personalities like Tariq Nasheed can manage to popularize fringe pseudoscience and false history into the mainstream for young impressionable people who don't know any better. This is like debating 5 years olds. Where did you learn how to critically think?
Do you realize that you posted a video of Frances Cress Welsing, a buffoon who espouses racial supremacist pseudoscience vs. William Shockley, a racist white supremacist buffoon who espouses eugenics and white superiority? What is posting a video of two racial supremacist crackpots supposed to prove? Because he's full of shyt, then somehow that means she's right? Why do y'all seem to think setting up a strawman of a binary choice between two extreme poles of lunacy gives more credence to one of those extreme poles of lunacy? Did it ever occur to you that they're both full of shyt?
Only fellow crackpots like the white dude in that video would even entertain Welsing's nonsense. You'll never see her debating Cornel West or Glenn Loury or Randall Kennedy, or any other black academic of any intellectual heft whatsoever because they know she's a joke...as does the rest of the world outside the tiny hermetically-sealed smartdumb bubble you live in.
Not one HC defender in this thread has made one single salient point about anything in this thread. There is not an iota of evidence for any of this garbage. You can't support any of the statements you make with facts or logic, you just say it's true, and then you just say anybody who doesn't agree is a cac, a c00n or a FBI agent.
Uh, I hate to break it to you, but y'all represent a tiny, miniscule, uneducated, uninformed segment of black people. People like Tariq Nasheed and Frances Cress Welsing need people to be uneducated and in the dark like you so they can make money. Without ignorant sheep, they'd be broke.
Do you morons not realize you're calling the majority of black people c00ns? Most black people don't take any of this shyt seriously. If you could bring Huey Newton, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr., Marcus Garvey, W. E. B. DuBois, Bayard Rustin, James Baldwin, Benjamin Banneker, Thurgood Marshall, and Frederick Douglass from the dead, you idiots would call them c00ns because they're all too intelligent and educated to buy any of this bullshyt.
in this thread....can't even disproof any of this ..t..