Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge.

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

What? I'm speaking in general for people that don't increase the post count, it's usually that or because they just don't know. But I just don't see a reason when it seems to bring on more annoyances than positives.

Nahhhh I believe you. I’m just giving you a hard time.

 

[TheHonorableOmarSharif]

Nicole is a female with a fat ass

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Ah, so it is unjustified. Like I said, this is sophistry.

This is about the fourth time you've either accused me of this, or framed my arguments in which you squared this in, on two separate occasions. I'm beginning to think this word is your escape route that you have just come across recently, and since it's a new shiny toy for you, you're overusing it for the sake of.

After I told you from the start that my aim is not through any means of justification, to which I reiterated to you, only then you get a lightbulb moment as if you're the one who came to the conclusion, all by yourself.

And it is not "sophistry". I already made it abundantly clear what my intentions are; I'm not trying to deceive, nor am I operating on any false belief of what I perceive to be true.

And on the first part, no, there is no formal contradiction, else provide the syllogism... But don't worry about that, there is no formal contradiction, I can see how one would think there is a general contradiction though, but I don't personally agree with it.

If you want to be literal here, need I remind you that you're the one who tried to make out like I was trying to say he contradicted himself, when I didn't specifically say that. I said he was guilty of hypocrisy. Of course, there's no formal contradiction here because that would take @Nicole0416_718_929_646212 having to acknowledge my initial post, and then denying the claims that I am making (which would then contradict the exposal he tried to pull on me).

Again, I ask, what are you getting from all this? Why is it you chose to involve yourself and prolong this exchange for as long as you have? Do me the courtesy of answering since I have afforded you the same with every one of your queries/questions.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Concerning … and he continues

Alerts​

1. [IMG alt="Gil Scott-Heroin"]https://www.thecoli.com/data/avatars/s/0/34.jpg?1603783836[/IMG]
   Gil Scott-Heroin quoted your post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   3 minutes ago
2. [IMG alt="Gil Scott-Heroin"]https://www.thecoli.com/data/avatars/s/0/34.jpg?1603783836[/IMG]
   Gil Scott-Heroin mentioned you in a post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   12 minutes ago
3. [IMG alt="Gil Scott-Heroin"]https://www.thecoli.com/data/avatars/s/0/34.jpg?1603783836[/IMG]
   Gil Scott-Heroin mentioned you in a post in the thread Hey Nicole. An Open Challenge..
   27 minutes ago

I do find it hilarious how every other poster that has either quoted you, or you've noticed making an appearance in here, you go and directly quote them, almost immediately, even referencing prior posts of theirs, but you seem to skate around quoting me when I tag and quote you.

And then you try to make it a point of not acknowledging me, all the while you're trying to bait other posters.

 

[Reflected]

This is about the fourth time you've either accused me of this, or framed my arguments in which you squared this in, on two separate occasions. I'm beginning to think this word is your escape route that you have just come across recently, and since it's a new shiny toy for you.

After I told you from the start that my aim is not through any means of justification, to which I reiterated to you, only then you get a lightbulb moment as if you're the one who came to the conclusion, all by yourself.

And it is not "sophistry". I already made it abundantly clear what my intentions are; I'm not trying to deceive, nor am I operating on any false belief of what I perceive to be true.

If you want to be literal here, need I remind you that you're the one who tried to make out like I was trying to say he contradicted himself, when I didn't specifically say that. I said he was guilty of hypocrisy. Of course, there's no formal contradiction here because that would take @Nicole0416_718_929_646212 having to acknowledge my initial post, and then denying the claims that I am making (which would then contradict the exposal she tried to pull on me).

Again, I ask, what are you getting from all this? Why is it you chose to involve yourself and prolong this exchange for as long as you have? Do me the courtesy of answering since I have afforded you the same with every one of your queries/questions.

It is sophistry, bro. You interpret me as targeting you personally, I'm saying that acting in that manner is sophistry. I never really engage argument or debate in a personal manner because I don't care for the person in most cases, just the plain language, the logic. So I'm saying in plain language, anyone that acts in that manner is engaging in sophistry.


And I can explain why and with definition if you think I use this word flippantly. If one holds publically to the position that it is immoral to misgender someone and then commits to misgendering someone, they are acting in contradiction. So if they acknowledge the contradiction and then refrain from committing it, they are acting in good faith because the ideals that they should hold to should be flushed out such that they would expect it of every agent. But if they continue to commit it, even admitting they are doing it, "trolling", then what do they really hold to if they can't even hold themselves to the position? Couldn't anyone hold to committing immoral actions simply because they have had it done to them or seen it done to others? So if one espouses a disdain for immorality while committing to these actions themselves and intentionally, they aren't engaging in good faith if they are looking to hold their agents accountable for acting in contradiction, because whatever you are grounding it to is clearly nonexistent if you can't even hold yourself to it, and not just that but fail to recognize the severity of it. That is what I consider sophistry.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

It is sophistry, bro. You interpret me as targeting you personally, I'm saying that acting in that manner is sophistry. I never really engage argument or debate in a personal manner because I don't care for the person in most cases, just the plain language, the logic. So I'm saying in plain language, anyone that acts in that manner is engaging in sophistry.

It doesn't have to be malicious for it to be personal.

The fact you even referenced our previous exchange and tried to critique my approach, again, tells me that it is personal (this is where you gave yourself up). If we never had that exchange, I can say quite confidently you wouldn't have quoted me in this thread.

And I can explain why and with definition if you think I use this word flippantly. If one holds publically to the position that it is immoral to misgender someone and then commits to misgendering someone, they are acting in contradiction. So if they acknowledge the contradiction and then refrain from committing it, they are acting in good faith because the ideals that they should hold to should be flushed out such that they would expect it of every agent. But if they continue to commit it, even admitting they are doing it, "trolling", then what do they really hold to if they can't even hold themselves to the position? Couldn't anyone hold to committing immoral actions simply because they have had it done to them or seen it done to others?

Here's the problem with this:

I have no reason to believe that @Nicole0416_718_929_646212 is indeed a female, so I'm not purposefully attributing the wrong pronouns to him. The truth of the matter is, the person in question has created a fabrication of their life on this board, to which we don't know what they say is truth and what is not, so everything they say about themselves, and really anything they post about that is subjective in nature, I believe should be taken to be as not true.

Normally, I wouldn't engage like this with someone on this board, but when I know their intent is only to deceive, well, I step on the court to play by the same rules (which is no rules, at all).

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

The question remains: why are you caping for him, when you know the contrary is closer to the truth?

@Nicole0416_718_929_646212 just completely ignored getting exposed on the previous page. You saw that yourself. He didn't even put up a fight or contest it; the same poster that will literally argue to the death about everything and anything, now suddenly has nothing to say when faced with their own bullshyt. The best they can do is put up a half-hearted attempt at linking a post with a handful of quotes that don't say a cotdamn thing.

This.

 

[Reflected]

It doesn't have to be malicious for it to be personal.

The fact you even referenced our previous exchange and tried to critique my approach, again, tells me that it is personal (this is where you gave yourself up). If we never had that exchange, I can say quite confidently you wouldn't have quoted me in this thread.

Here's the problem with this:

I have no reason to believe that @Nicole0416_718_929_646212 is indeed a female, so I'm not purposefully attributing the wrong pronouns to him. The truth of the matter is, the person in question has created a fabrication of their life on this board, to which we don't know what they say is truth and what is not, so everything they say about themselves, and really anything they post about that is subjective in nature, I believe should be taken to be as not true.

Normally, I wouldn't engage like this with someone on this board, but when I know their intent is only to deceive, well, I step on the court to play by the same rules (which is no rules, at all).

If I'm addressing a person, that is personal, of course, if I am highlighting an issue in rhetoric, logic, arguments, etc., that is never personal, I simply can't allow it to be because while correcting it, I would be acting in a fallacious manner if my basis for critique is rooted in subjectivity (I feel). Most disagreements, I can't say all because I make errors, can be rooted in formal logic. So if I say, "this is sophistry", I define sophistry, explain the situation and how it correlates, and I also give an example to tie it in. Search my name + "sophistry", similar definition and usage, I just would rarely use it here because most don't engage in argumentation in that manner, there isn't any rooted intent. If I say "this is a contradiction", I mean it as a literal contradiction, as it pertains to its formal definition, it's not me saying I "feel" like it is a contradiction unless I couldn't formally map it out, in which case I would readily admit that because I am not adept in formal logic, at all.

========


On the second part, if the person carries and refers to themselves as a woman, you are misgendering when you go around with the "he" stuff. Surely that doesn't need to be flushed out, especially with someone presenting their pronouns in their profile title.

Simply put, you aren't justified in doing that, you know this, you acknowledged it, you should drop it or you are knowingly acting in bad faith, thus the sophist trait presents.

 

[Low End Derrick]

Who has that exchange where she/they didn't know what a clit was?

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

If I'm addressing a person, that is personal, of course, if I am highlighting an issue in rhetoric, logic, arguments, etc., that is never personal, I simply can't allow it to be because while correcting it, I would be acting in a fallacious manner if my basis for critique is rooted in subjectivity (I feel).

Can we save all the theatrics and posturing and just come to an mutual admission that because we had an exchange the other day, that then influenced your decision to quote me in this thread? I found it hard to believe it's purely coincidental that in the seven years you've posted on this board we've never crossed paths, but within a matter of days you initiate an exchange with me in two different threads.

On the second part, if the person carries and refers to themselves as a woman, you are misgendering when you go around with the "he" stuff. Surely that doesn't need to be flushed out, especially with someone presenting their pronouns in their profile title.

Simply put, you aren't justified in doing that, you know this, you acknowledged it, you should drop it or you are knowingly acting in bad faith, thus the sophist trait presents.

I'll just drop this here -

• 
  Claims to be female (yet to be verified)
• Claims to be a high ranking member of the bloods (yet to be verified)
• Claims to be a hotshot lawyer (been proven that she isn't)
• Claims to be black (even though she's said that she isn't)
• Claims to be mother, yet has 50,000 posts on an internet messageboard (most which are 1000 word essays)
• Abuses her kids
• Joined in 2017, but din't start posting until 2018?
• Is close to 50 years old
• Quick to threaten brehs with violence, yet when pressed, constantly ducks the fade
• Quick to call brehs white, yet when she's challenged over her race, constantly ducks the fade
• Quick to use peoples emotional vulnerabilities against them
• Posted violent threats that only white people would even dream of doing (Kinda like @TRY GOD and his obsession with raping breh's moms)
• Has a problem with homosexual sex workers, yet is willing to hire one for her own pleasure
• Uses pictures of other people's infant children on a website for adults
• Had multiple good brehs banned off of some bullshyt
• A supporter of 4chán conspiracy theories (Is potentially a right wing Trump supporting agent)
• Is a Dap panderer
• Claims NYC, but lives in VA
• Gets tetchy whenever anyone shyts on NYC, even when it's deserved
• Has a sick obsession with having other peoples kids as her avatar (Is potentially a pedophile?)
• Has the posting style of previously banned coli members (King Musa, ****, etc.)
• Seems to have some sort of immunity from the mods (and has proudly said so)

I'm of the belief you lose the right on an anonymous msgboard to force anyone to refer to oneself by what they identify as and who they claim to be when they lie to this degree. It's a state of becoming less of a person and more of a character that you're playing, and characters should be treated as such. It's why it becomes less of a normal interaction, and more about it being a game. You're up in here trying to parametrize this within the margins of everyday msgboard discussions, where it is out of moral decency to coinhabit within this space, amicably, if only for the purposes of doing what msgboards are primarily used for.

My listed pronouns are satire. It's an in-joke. It's not meant to be taken seriously.

 

[Strapped]

Nicole is a female with a fat ass

I don't believe it dudes keep saying she's a man

 

[Carl Tethers]

Duhhh

 

[Reflected]

Can we save all the theatrics and posturing and just come to an mutual admission that because we had an exchange the other day, that then influenced your decision to quote me in this thread? I found it hard to believe it's purely coincidental that in the seven years you've posted on this board we've never crossed paths, but within a matter of days you initiate an exchange with me in two different threads.

I'll just drop this here -

I'm of the belief you lose the right on an anonymous msgboard to force anyone to refer to oneself by what they identify as and who they claim to be when they lie to this degree. It's a state of becoming less of a person and more of a character that you're playing, and characters should be treated as such. It's why it becomes less of a normal interaction, and more about it being a game. You're up in here trying to parametrize this within the margins of everyday msgboard discussions, where it is out of moral decency to coinhabit within this space, amicably, if only for the purposes of doing what msgboards are primarily used for.

My listed pronouns are satire. It's an in-joke. It's not meant to be taken seriously.

I would still quote you in this thread. As simply as I can put this, I'm a determinist, I don't really attribute much to agency, so I'm being honest when I say this isn't personal. But I can easily see why one would think that and I would say they were justified in having that belief given how most operate, all I can say is that I don't operate in that manner, you can believe me or choose not to. But you can also search my name and "determinist" or "agency", and you will see I'm consistent on that.
============

On the second half, I probably just have your beliefs misunderstood. Like for the pronoun stuff, I thought, given my understanding of you, that you were doing that to normalize usage, which I have no issue with. If it is the case that I simply have you misunderstood, then "sophist" isn't applicable here, and I would retract it. I thought you were meaning to promote progressivism and to be recognized as such, that is why I thought your hypocrisy and refusal to accept it and change as being on par with partaking in sophistry.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

I don't believe it dudes keep saying she's a man

Dude you were in my DMs and mad that you never received a response just like @Neo The Resurrected ONE - I don’t respond to DMs from randoms.

Why is nicole56758 always acting like a super cereal kunt?​

Does she have a man ? Can she keep a man ? Who knows ,does she need some D ?

• Strapped
• 
  
• Post #198
• 
  
• Feb 14, 2019
• 
  
• Forum: The Bushes

I don't believe it dudes keep saying she's a man

You’re still mad after your coli bestie was banned circa 2019 after trying to cash app for details, then offed himself dramatically after bussy footing for the coli

@Nicole0416_718_212_646NYC you see it right? how they always tryna turn some shyt into something gay in this subforum...
This shyt ain't normal...
Everyone on here know I watch bbw porn

Fux her let her stay gone

@cyndaquil this was @Little Foot’s sidekick right here ^^ he came strapped

Been mad for 3 years since he friend was exposed - This dumbass still has peestd of the time when that homo had the foot up his coli boyfriend’s ass
…..

Little Foot Out Here Cash App'ing Men

nikka rushed in here thinking you was getting exposed. Only to get exposed. This might be a rafters thread. “Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.”

www.thecoli.com

Gotdamn, y’all never learn -

This is wild concerning - been @‘ing me more in 4 years, than your offline actual relationships that you obviously lack keeping in touch with or else you wouldn’t this obsessed.

2018

Nicole0416​

1. @
   
   
   

   Some women have UGLY ASS PUSSIES​

   Nicole0416 pussay
   • @Strapped
   • 
     
   • Post #311
   • 
     
   • Apr 8, 2019
   • 
     
   • Forum: The Locker Room
2. @
   
   
   

   I start working on my career tommorow. I want to get drunk today. What's the go to liquor?​

   Is Nicole0416 invited
   • @Strapped
   • 
     
   • Post #4
   • 
     
   • Apr 8, 2019
   • 
     
   • Forum: The Locker Room
3. @
   
   
   

   Any of you colibrehs smell a womans musk on public transportation?​

   @Nicole0416
   • @Strapped
   • 
     
   • Post #9
   • 
     
   • Apr 23, 2019
   • 
     
   • Forum: The Locker Room
4. @
   
   
   

   7 Explosive ‘Catfish’ Reveals That Didn’t Go Well​

   @Nicole0416 staged
   • @Strapped
   • 
     
   • Post #3
   • 
     
   • Mar 18, 2019
   • 
     
   • Forum: The Locker Room
5. @
   
   
   

   Man MF Popeye's. Got that Aunt jamima ohh chile bullshyt. Black people don't even cook the dam food​

   I hear that Nicole0416 likes kfc
   • @Strapped
   • 
     
   • Post #67
   • 
     
   • May 2, 2019
   • 
     
   • Forum: The Locker Room
6. @
   
   
   

   I'm so horny for you bytch​

   @Nicole0416
   • @Strapped
   • 
     
   • Post #5
   • 
     
   • Apr 22, 2019
   • 
     
   • Forum: The Bushes
7. @
   
   
   

   I just bought my lucky dice from the store. What are the rules in a dice game?​

   How are we gonna spin this on Nicole0416
   • @Strapped
   • 
     
   • Post #13
   • 
     
   • Apr 25, 2019
   • 
     
   • Forum: The Locker Room
8. @
   
   
   

   Ain’t Nothing Wrong with Interracial Dating...​

   @Nicole0416 I've only dated negro women
   • @Strapped
   • 
     
   • Post #126
   • 
     
   • Mar 9, 2019
   • 
     
   • Forum: The Locker Room
9. @
   
   
   

   Binge fukked 4 females this weekend and last shorty just left this morning​

   You weren't on my mind ma
   • @Strapped
   • 
     
   • Post #144
   • 
     
   • May 6, 2019
   • 
     
   • Forum: The Locker Room
10. @
    
    
    

    Ice cold Sprite is the greatest soda ever!​

    I wonder what @Nicole0416 likes to sip on
    • @Strapped
    • 
      
    • Post #37
    • 
      
    • May 5, 2019
    • 
      
    • Forum: The Locker Room
11. @
    
    
    

    I'm ready to tell my lady I want to settle down. How do I pull this off?​

    @Nicole0416 ya boy wants to make a wife outa you
    • @Strapped
    • 
      
    • Post #17
    • 
      
    • Apr 24, 2019
    • 
      
    • Forum: The Locker Room
12. @
    
    
    

    I think my homie might be on the down low brehs​

    @Nicole0416 you have an appreciation thread
    • @Strapped
    • 
      
    • Post #12
    • 
      
    • Sep 22, 2018
    • 
      
    • Forum: The Locker Room
13. @
    
    
    

    Be a black female cop brehettes​

    I can
    • @Strapped
    • 
      
    • Post #40
    • 
      
    • Sep 14, 2018
    • 
      
    • Forum: The Locker Room
14. @
    
    
    

    Netflix Cooking Up Another Horror Series, "Ghoul"​

    You might get scared ma
    • @Strapped
    • 
      
    • Post #10
    • 
      
    • Aug 25, 2018
    • 
      
    • Forum: The Film Room
15. @
    
    
    

    Stripper Makes 50k On Onlyfans In The First Month, Quits Stripping Blows Threw 50K​

    I would support her tho
    • @Strapped
    • 
      
    • Post #71
    • 
      
    • Jan 29, 2020
    • 
      
    • Forum: The Locker Room
16. @
    
    
    

    A majority of you women all have your heads up your ass​

    @Nicole0416 can you send op a nip, booty or coochie pic to calm his nerves thanks in advance
    • @Strapped
    • 
      
    • Post #4
    • 
      
    • May 9, 2019
    • 
      
    • Forum: The Locker Room

 

[Hathaway]

Man wtf is going on in here