It's typically more effective (and therefore, scarier) when you have to make sense of what's happening, rather than being told, explicitly. If that makes any sense.So you’d prefer it to have been a tad more ambiguous?
It's typically more effective (and therefore, scarier) when you have to make sense of what's happening, rather than being told, explicitly. If that makes any sense.So you’d prefer it to have been a tad more ambiguous?
So you’d prefer it to have been a tad more ambiguous?
I don't think it would've been all that ambiguous if it ended 5 minutes earlier. But I think wrapping things up so neatly and concretely does a disservice to the themes of grief, family trauma, etc that are so well developed otherwise.
It's typically more effective (and therefore, scarier) when you have to make sense of what's happening, rather than being told, explicitly. If that makes any sense.
shyt I didn’t think it was neatly wrapped up at all. For me, the ending left more questions than answers. And actually made it all seedier and worse because the family never stood a chance.
Can someone explain how the mother figures out Charlie is dead? All you hear in the scene with Peter laying in bed is a muffled conversation and then sudden wailing.
It's my #9 as of now but i do agree the last scene kept it from being an all timer.This might be in my Top 10 if not for the wildly misjudged final scene
They go to the car because it’s her car. Charlie’s body was still in the car with no head