Again, the burden of proof is on YOU. You're the one making outlandish claims. I'm not copying and pasting anything.
Let's start by pointing out the glaring flaw in the So-called "black people are the 12 tribes of Israel" theory.
1. The Jews were a mixed multitude prior to the siege of 70 AD. The bible and history confirm that. Or are we forgetting the Persian, Greek and Roman rule of the holy land? Esther married the king of persia, Roman governor Felix was married to Drusilla, who was a Jew. Timothy the disciple was the product of a Greek father and Hebrew mother (Acts 16:1-3). In Acts 13:1 Simeon is called Niger, which means black. Now why would he be called black if they were ALL supposedly black? Countering that with Paul being called Egyptian in Acts 21:38 is to say you don't know much about history. Especially since Alexandria at that time was a multicultural metropolis filled with Greeks, Romans, Jews, Arabs, Syrians, Ethiopians etc. But if you wanna hit me with Amos 9, or Joseph & Moses being confused for Egyptians, I'll be more than happy to debunks those for you as well.
2. We know Jews were sent to North Africa, specifically Egypt after the siege of 70 AD, thus fufilling Deuteronomy 28:68.
http://www.ccel.org/j/josephus/works/war-6.htm
So this Fronto slew all those that had been seditious and robbers, who were impeached one by another; but of the young men he chose out the tallest and most beautiful, and reserved them for the triumph; and as for the rest of the multitude that were above seventeen years old, he put them into bonds, and sent them to the Egyptian mines
But they were also sent in large numbers throughout ALL the roman provinces, which included countries that WEREN'T in Africa. Thus setting in motion the fufillment of Deuteronomy 28:64.
http://www.ccel.org/j/josephus/works/war-6.htm
Titus also sent a great number into the provinces, as a present to them, that they might be destroyed upon their theatres, by the sword and by the wild beasts; but those that were under seventeen years of age were sold for slaves.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_province
This to go along with the fact that there were LARGE communities of jews in places like Greece, Rome, Spain, Portugal, Turkey, etc.
3. The Jewish communities of West Africa were the result of the Migrant Jews who came into the area and established communities there. Sephardic, Egyptian, Moroccan and Berber Jews. We know the original people of Kemet were undoubtedly black, but Egypt had also come off centuries upon centuries of intermixing with Hyksos, Persians, Greeks, Romans etc. Just like the Berbers, Moroccans and Jews themselves..
In fact, look at this portait of Leo Africanus, who was a Berber Muslim (and later Catholic).
^That ain't black bruh.
4. Those Jews converted some of the local population during their stay until aggressive Islamic rule started creeping in, resulting in the murder and expulsion of the jews in that region. The expelled Jews went north to the large communities in Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, and Egypt . The local (Read: Hametic) population that remained were converted back to Islam.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews_of_Bilad_el-Sudan#Trade_and_establishment_of_communities
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews_of_Bilad_el-Sudan#Islamic_era
Leo Africanus:
In Garura there were some very rich Jews. The intervention of the preacher (Muhammid al-Maghili) of Tlemcen set up the pillage of their goods, and most of them have been killed by the population. This event took place during the same year when the Jews had been expelled from Spain and Sicily by the Catholic King."
"The king (Askia) is a declared enemy of the Jews. He will not allow any to live in the city. If he hears it said that a Berber merchant frequents them or does business with them, he confiscates his goods."
So there goes the "they were all black and waiting to be taken as slaves" theory.
5. The Jews that were expelled from Spain didn't all just head into Africa.
Lol someone seriously underrates the prospect of INTERMIXING and migration during 1400 years the jews had been taken out of Judea. In fact, Jews had been migrating to spain before Jesus was even born. Even Paul mentioned his plans to travel there (Romans 15:24-28)
In conclusion, the real truth is the vast majority of the slaves sent to the Americas and the caribbean were Hametic muslims and local tribesmen & women.
www.youtube.com/watch?v= GJ5P8SMwo2U[/media]
www.youtube.com/watch?v= 0xzzwgbZKko[/media]
(Combine each link to each)
You can't be serious. This proves my point more than it does yours. You just stated the Hebrew word 'alluph' was translated into the word 'duke' by people in the Roman Empire (white people), and was then incorporated into Old English, Spanish, Portugese, and French (other white people) 'as a title of nobility'. The King James version is written in Old English. You essentially saying that the word duke today and 'alluph' translated to duke back in 1611 when the people knew of the Dukes of Scotland, England etc., but instead of using a different word because it wasn't accurate, they still used that word anyway? There's a reason the word 'duke' is what was used. Make sure you don't forget the word 'kings' in Genesis 36:31, which is the same in ALL versions.
