what's the difference really?OKC should've never got rid of Brooks
Now they got bum ass Donovan
what's the difference really?OKC should've never got rid of Brooks
Now they got bum ass Donovan
Exactly.maybe he shouldn't shoot as many 3's and focus on getting to the rim or using his midrange more especially with him struggling to shoot. You have to develop other parts of your game more.
Exactly.
The fact that players shoot 3s just because it's more than 2 is one of the main problems with this era. That and analytic clowns
One of the corniest in game moments I've ever seenWhen he and LeBron dapped each other up in that playoff game in Miami is what got nikkaz hype
Indiana Pacers fans will tell you this is what he always really was.
He has the "look" of a superstar: tall, athletic, two way talent, highly marketable, hates black women, etc but he's never been that guy.
He's best suited as a second or third option. Still an all-star but not a superstar. Never was and never will be.
PG-13 LITERALLY said this week( and im paraphrasing): "my arm ain't shootin the ball right at this time; not sure what's wrong, but i'll try to fix it"So we forget PG was leading the pacers to the best record 4 years ago? It’s all about situation and right now playing in OKC is a shyt situation. We see what Oladipo is doing away from Russ
Would only give a #3 option. He's too inconsistent. He was never going to be that superstar caliber player. He's always been an all-star caliber type player. Not even perennial all-star starter type player.He wants to be a superstar, but he's actually a two-way third option.