the cac mamba
Veteran
there was a blue wave in 2020, you dumb trannyDemocrats still running the tired "Republicans will be embarrassed and distance themselves from Trump!" playbook that failed in 2020 and 2024.![]()
Last edited:
there was a blue wave in 2020, you dumb trannyDemocrats still running the tired "Republicans will be embarrassed and distance themselves from Trump!" playbook that failed in 2020 and 2024.![]()
Almost like a once in a time pandemic happenedthere was a blue wave in 2020, you dumb tranny
if you can't even give Dems credit for winning in 2020Almost like a once in a time pandemic happened![]()
This is bullshyt.Yes. By pursuing a political program that exists beyond the partisan divide. Large scale public policies like universal healthcare, universal pre-k, free college, paid family leave, raising the minimum wage, ending wars, restoring democratic norms against oligarchic takeover, etc all have appeal across the political spectrum.Harris didn't credibly runon any of these things. My problem with the Harris campaign wasn't that she wasn't explicitly rejecting votes from Republicans, it's that she ended up having them be a central stakeholder in her campaign messaging and policy. She pivoted on immigration and adopted the right-wing Republican plan because she was afraid of these "disenfranchised" Republicans calling her soft. She pivoted on climate and abandoned her prior positions on the environment because she was afraid of these "disenfranchised" Republicans saying she was a hippie. She refused to pursue a moral position on the Gaza genocide and started touting "the most lethal fighting force" because she wanted to appease these "disenfranchised" Republicans. Her campaign didn't actually offer much in the way of hope for progress from the Biden years because she was too worried about what moderate Republicans would think, so she settled for just being the non-Trump figure. She tried to have it both ways and lost because of it.
They pivot to posting some 2023 polls while ignoring the late 2024 and 2025 ones...weird that you can only read a poll when it's convenient
where's this level of basic analysis for losing 80/20 on trehs in sports![]()
I’m asking you directly:How does her running away from her own views make her electable? Trump told people Haitians eat cats and dogs and doubled down on it when he was wrong. This coward shyt is why democrats lose.
Left wing needs a Liberal Alex Jones/Info wars.Qasim Rashid, Esq. (@qasimrashid.com)
These three charts are devastating. We knew LA Times, WSJ, Wash Post, NY Post, Fox News, Meta, & Twitter are owned by pro Trump billionaires. Sadly, right wingers dominate social media too, transforming the USA into a right wing regime mimicking Russia & China...bsky.app
High-Level Summary:
Recent analyses reveal a significant imbalance in online media influence, with right-leaning voices dominating digital platforms and shaping public discourse, especially among younger demographics. A study from Media Matters underscores this trend, illustrating the overwhelming online reach of conservative creators compared to progressive ones. This disparity is notably contributing to a substantial ideological shift, as younger voters increasingly lean right.
Experts warn this shift aligns the United States closer to illiberal values akin to those found in authoritarian regimes, posing threats to democratic principles. To reverse this trajectory, there’s a pressing need for more robust support and investment in progressive voices committed to justice, human rights, and democratic values.
Key Takeaway Points:
• Right-wing content creators currently dominate the online media landscape, heavily influencing younger audiences.
• An 11-point shift to the right among young voters occurred between the 2020 and 2024 elections.
• The U.S. is moving towards alignment with illiberal regimes, challenging foundational democratic principles.
• Supporting progressive content creators financially and through subscriptions is essential to balancing the online media environment.
• Immediate action is required to strengthen the progressive message and uphold democratic ideals against rising extremist narratives.
Just shows that too much money was spent on traditional media and that they need to inject 200 million of that into the left. The problem is that those sort of people aren’t as “clean” as many on the left would like. And by that I mean, you’re going to end up with a lot of bros and hotep adjacent ass people that bring people in.Left wing needs a Liberal Alex Jones/Info wars.
A sensational/entertaining conspiracy theorist that highlights how the oligarchs control our society and spreads disinformation for control
The left needs Dr umar and bill burr more than they knowJust shows that too much money was spent on traditional media and that they need to inject 200 million of that into the left. The problem is that those sort of people aren’t as “clean” as many on the left would like. And by that I mean, you’re going to end up with a lot of bros and hotep adjacent ass people that bring people in.
bill burr types (meThe left needs Dr umar and bill burr more than they know![]()