Me mad??
never that..i dnt see no one dissin the gawd Hov
Anyways..ur first two points about consent..really dont matter..because like I said..consent stands on the basis of right and worth which we have already concluded are illusions based on ur worldviewm due to there not being no purpose for our existence and us just being the results of chance matter and time
Well like I said, we create the rules.
And consent kinda does matter if you want people to respect YOUR consent.
Secondly..it seems u agree that u have no say to speak on anything in the issue of right and wrong considering ur worldview
Well...yeah.
But if I live in a place that has those standards, I can either abide by them, change them, or leave.
But to think theres an OBJECTIVE morality, you'd be wasting your time.
If u truly adhere to the worldview in which u claim u cannot and i repeat cannot honestly condemn any act on the basis of a violation of rights or morals..because like i said..those things dont exist
Precisely.
Which is why I dont claim objective morality to exist...BUT since we live in a society and i really don't feel like dying of hunger or murder, we come up with rules to navigate how we interact with each other and develop a society that protects our collective interests.
So if someone wanna rape a bytch or fukk a cow or get deepthroated by a dolphin who are u, who adheres to the worldview which u claim, to condemn that nikka.
I live in a place that has rules prohibiting that.
I COULD do that if I wanted to, but I dont want to incur the consequences.
Is he supposed to let an illusory concept(morality) stop him from his pleasure?
Wouldnt that be the "non intellectual" way to do things?
he's free to conquer an unruled part of the earth and institute that policy.