FTC sues to Block M$-Activision deal

[The Mad Titan]

It's actually a great rebuttal, you're just triggered because you know it's true.

Titanfall 1 never came out on other platforms. Titanfall 2, the sequel came out on other platforms.

SFV came out on PC, now SFVI is coming out on all platforms.

Same way Bayonetta was in limbo, SFV was bankrolled by Sony because at that time it was Said that Sony footed the bill since Capcom wasn't doing so great at the time. So why wasn't this an issue with Bayonetta but SFV it's an issue? Its legacy/popularity is irrelevant to the point.

All you guys have displayed is this weird notion of when Microsoft or Nintendo does something it's great for the gaming world but when Sony does it it's because they're an evil corporation that's hell-bent on abusing players. Of course y'all not liking me bringing up how MSFT paid for Tomb Raider's timed exclusivity, a game that as you said it yourself, "has been on every console out at the time and then some."

And for your "it needs to be active!!" point, SFV was cross play compatible between Steam and PSN. I never heard of that game having any issues with finding players or low player count. Seems to be alive and well.


Is it a problem for third-party exclusivity or nah?

So titanfall (a New IP) is published and then bought my MS and is Multiplatform (TF2) got it. Crazy Sony couldn't do that with SF5

SF5 (a long ongoing IP) was banked rolled by sony and published by Capcom, (which means it wasn't banked rolled enough to where it was published by Sony as bank rolled games typically go.) released exclusively on PS4

Bayonetta was bank rolled by Nintendo and ironically enough guess what? Published by nintendo is exclusive a series that only has 1 entry being Multi Platform that originally skipped the nintendo system completely anyway.


Yall worried about what Xbox might do and does do but conveniently omit any and everything Sony has done and CONTINUES to do. That's really the kicker. "CONTINUES to do"

 

[Fatboi1]

did you prefer the SNES or Genesis version of Titanfall

Keep it consistent Daze, is third-party exclusivity a problem or nah?

 

[The Mad Titan]

did you prefer the SNES or Genesis version of Titanfall

He probably enjoyed the dreamcast or PS of titanfall

 

[The Mad Titan]

Sony has Spiderman locked up a series that was multi platform.
Final fantasy locked up a series that was mulit platform.

I mean those to alone are enough to where anyone with common sense should be like well it's fair game for whatever nintendo or MS have to do.

Spiderman one of the most popular superheroes in the WORLD and Final fantasy one of, if not the most popular RPG series in the world.

After coming off locking up Street fighter, the most popular fighting game series in the world.

 

[Fatboi1]

So titanfall (a New IP) is published and then bought my MS and is Multiplatform (TF2) got it. Crazy Sony couldn't do that with SF5

What? SF6 is coming to Xbox breh.

Street Fighter Returns to Xbox in 2023 with Street Fighter 6 - Xbox Wire

One of the most iconic and storied fighting games series returns to Xbox in 2023 when Street Fighter 6 launches for Xbox Series X|S. Powered by RE Engine, the same tech that has given us gorgeous photorealistic visuals to Capcom franchises like Resident Evil and Devil May Cry, Street Fighter 6...

news.xbox.com

Crazy Sony couldn't create a new IP? Is this the argument you REALLY want to have right now?

SF5 (a long ongoing IP) was banked rolled by sony and published by Capcom, (which means it wasn't banked rolled enough to where it was published by Sony as bank rolled games typically go.) released exclusively on PS4

Capcom Revenue and Profit Fall Due to Lack Of New Games

Resident Evil publisher reports sales drop of 51 percent while profit dips 39 percent.

www.gamespot.com

Dead Rising was a "long ongoing IP" and was funded(part 3) by MSFT but yet you're quiet on that one. Was that a problem?

Bayonetta was bank rolled by Nintendo and ironically enough guess what? Published by nintendo is exclusive a series that only has 1 entry being Multi Platform that originally skipped the nintendo system completely anyway.

What is this even? Who cares who published it? I only am talking about where the end product is. Does Nintendo publishing the game make it A ok? If Sony "published" FFVII Remake would that suddenly make your faux concerns alleviated? Come on breh.

Yall worried about what Xbox might do and does do but conveniently omit any and everything Sony has done and CONTINUES to do. That's really the kicker. "CONTINUES to do"

Yeah, Sony continued to lock down Street Fighter right?
MSFT didn't "continue" to lock down games in Ark 2 pretty much indefinitely? Sony paid for Ark 1 to be on PS Plus, MSFT doing it on Gamepass bu conveniently this won't be talked about because it wasn't a game that had the streets on lock in the 90s right?

Microsoft and Sony paid millions to bring Ark games to their subscription services | VGC

Xbox Game Pass and PlayStation Plus fees revealed in regulatory filing…

www.videogameschronicle.com

 

[Fatboi1]

Sony has Spiderman locked up a series that was multi platform.
Final fantasy locked up a series that was mulit platform.

I mean those to alone are enough to where anyone with common sense should be like well it's fair game for whatever nintendo or MS have to do.

Spiderman one of the most popular superheroes in the WORLD and Final fantasy one of, if not the most popular RPG series in the world.

After coming off locking up Street fighter, the most popular fighting game series in the world.

Sony doesn't own the rights to Spider-Man videogames, that's still up to Marvel. They came to everyone, MSFT turned it down.

Microsoft turned down deal to develop Xbox exclusive Marvel games

The company passed on the offer so it could focus on its own IPs instead

www.gamesradar.com

Xbox Reportedly Turned Down An Exclusive Marvel Games Development Deal

Microsoft turned down an exclusive partnership with Marvel years ago, paving the way for Sony to make a deal that would lead to the creation of Marvel's Spider-Man.

www.gamespot.com

MSFT turned down a deal to make a Marvel exclusive. What's up with that? You don't even have your info straight .

If Spider-Man was a Sony IP, it would NEVER appear anywhere else:

This is a Nintendo Exclusive.



They struck a deal with Marvel, a deal that again Microsoft turned down. Instead of being mad at Microsoft, you're mad at another company doing something that benefited them.

Also, Let's be real FF isn't that popular on Xbox. So let's not cry over spilled milk.

79% of UK Final Fantasy XV sales were on PS4, 21% Xbox One

Almost four out of every five physical launch copies sold on PS4.

www.videogamer.com

Y'all don't even buy JRPGS like that on Xbox but suddenly acting like it not being there is a huge deal. COD on the other hand, I can bet that that game sold roughly the same on both platforms.

He probably enjoyed the dreamcast or PS of titanfall

You enjoyed the Dreamcast version of Death Stranding?

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Sony doesn't own the rights to Spider-Man videogames, that's still up to Marvel. They came to everyone, MSFT turned it down.

Microsoft turned down deal to develop Xbox exclusive Marvel games

The company passed on the offer so it could focus on its own IPs instead

www.gamesradar.com

Xbox Reportedly Turned Down An Exclusive Marvel Games Development Deal

Microsoft turned down an exclusive partnership with Marvel years ago, paving the way for Sony to make a deal that would lead to the creation of Marvel's Spider-Man.

www.gamespot.com

MSFT turned down a deal to make a Marvel exclusive. What's up with that? You don't even have your info straight .

If Spider-Man was a Sony IP, it would NEVER appear anywhere else:

They struck a deal with Marvel, a deal that again Microsoft turned down. Instead of being mad at Microsoft, you're mad at another company doing something that benefited them.

Also, Let's be real FF isn't that popular on Xbox. So let's not cry over spilled milk.

79% of UK Final Fantasy XV sales were on PS4, 21% Xbox One

Almost four out of every five physical launch copies sold on PS4.

www.videogamer.com

Y'all don't even buy JRPGS like that on Xbox but suddenly acting like it not being there is a huge deal. COD on the other hand, I can bet that that game sold roughly the same on both platforms.

Quick, somebody make a sony stan bingo card

 

[Fatboi1]

Quick, somebody make a sony stan bingo card

Quick, somebody turn to a joke because I'm losing the argument .

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Quick, somebody turn to a joke because I'm losing the argument .

There’s no argument to lose,

You being mad weird in here. If anything is established it’s that no system is entitled to any game.

You in here having a goalposts fight with yourself

 

[daze23]

Keep it consistent Daze, is third-party exclusivity a problem or nah?

remember when 2pac was playing Sunset Overdrive in Juice

 

[Fatboi1]

There’s no argument to lose,

You being mad weird in here. If anything is established it’s that no system is entitled to any game.

You in here having a goalposts fight with yourself

Being weird is providing facts to you dummies lol. No system is entitled to any game, so why then argue about that very fact in the case of paid exclusivity only on Sony's end but ignore that when MSFT does it with caveats like "Oh it's a new IP, oh it's published by MSFt etc."?

 

[The Mad Titan]

What? SF6 is coming to Xbox breh.

Street Fighter Returns to Xbox in 2023 with Street Fighter 6 - Xbox Wire

One of the most iconic and storied fighting games series returns to Xbox in 2023 when Street Fighter 6 launches for Xbox Series X|S. Powered by RE Engine, the same tech that has given us gorgeous photorealistic visuals to Capcom franchises like Resident Evil and Devil May Cry, Street Fighter 6...

news.xbox.com

Crazy Sony couldn't create a new IP? Is this the argument you REALLY want to have right now?

Capcom Revenue and Profit Fall Due to Lack Of New Games

Resident Evil publisher reports sales drop of 51 percent while profit dips 39 percent.

www.gamespot.com

Dead Rising was a "long ongoing IP" and was funded(part 3) by MSFT but yet you're quiet on that one. Was that a problem?


What is this even? Who cares who published it? I only am talking about where the end product is. Does Nintendo publishing the game make it A ok? If Sony "published" FFVII Remake would that suddenly make your faux concerns alleviated? Come on breh.



Yeah, Sony continued to lock down Street Fighter right?
MSFT didn't "continue" to lock down games in Ark 2 pretty much indefinitely? Sony paid for Ark 1 to be on PS Plus, MSFT doing it on Gamepass bu conveniently this won't be talked about because it wasn't a game that had the streets on lock in the 90s right?

Microsoft and Sony paid millions to bring Ark games to their subscription services | VGC

Xbox Game Pass and PlayStation Plus fees revealed in regulatory filing…

www.videogameschronicle.com

Since you don't seem to get it I'll just keep it simple. Sony is taking away HUGE long ongoing IPs away platforms as well as new IPs. More so than any one else.

That's the long and short of it.

On top of that their business practices have been far from consumer friendly

 

[Fatboi1]

remember when 2pac was playing Sunset Overdrive in Juice

I remember MF Doom trying to Play Lost and Damned on PS3 but couldn't for a year

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Being weird is providing facts to you dummies lol. No system is entitled to any game, so why then argue about that very fact in the case of paid exclusivity only on Sony's end but ignore that when MSFT does it with caveats like "Oh it's a new IP, oh it's published by MSFt etc."?

Nobody is ignoring anything.

Check your last post, you literally did everything you are accusing others of doing right in that same post.

Sony stans are insane

 

[Fatboi1]

Since you don't seem to get it I'll just keep it simple. Sony is taking away HUGE long ongoing IPs away platforms as well as new IPs. More so than any one else.

That's the long and short of it.

On top of that their business practices have been far from consumer friendly

Read your sentence out loud 10 times and then look at this image:

Is Elder Scrolls VI not a big game?