Snake Puppy
Rookie
Define what a white person isso to clarify. you're going to throw away your own better judgement and belief out the window in favor of what cacs say, correct?
Define what a white person isso to clarify. you're going to throw away your own better judgement and belief out the window in favor of what cacs say, correct?
The problem with Zimmerman was not his partially Black grandparents.The problem was the WHITE JURORS thought he was WHITE ENOUGH to acquit him for killing a BLACK personi didn't want to get into the fact that it was "black on black" crime according to the one drop rule
some of these dudes are going to end up with grandsons and great grandsons like zimmerman too
That marcus dude is just trolling at this point..Nobody is that dumb formal..Or are they?I've clearly said that there are people of mixed racial heritage classified as white. The Italinas are an example of an entire people with mixed racial heritage that are classified as white. If you want a specific individual example of a mixed race person bein classified and "claimed" by whites, then look at George Zimmerman. Brown skinned biracial and mixed race people of African descent are not accepted into the white community and they are subjected to oppression courtesy of the system of white supremacy. That is what what makes them black. Thag is what makes us all black. That shouldn't be too hard for you to understand.
Race is a social classification that is not self determined. Why can't you understand that simple ass concept? Are you really this dumb? If you're brown skinned of African descent then you will be seen and treated as a black person regardless of what race you see or view yourself as. Raven Symone said that she doesn't see/view herself as black and that she sees herself as just a human. Does that change the fact that she's seen and classified as black?
You're a fukking idiot my man.
For some reason I see it more as them supporting a pawn that went against a black person.The problem with Zimmerman was not his partially Black grandparents.The problem was the WHITE JURORS thought he was WHITE ENOUGH to acquit him for killing a BLACK person
The problem with Zimmerman was not his partially Black grandparents.The problem was the WHITE JURORS thought he was WHITE ENOUGH to acquit him for killing a BLACK person
Why? Isn't that the same one drop rule y'all trying to force feed the other people. So why doesn't it apply this time?
Thats because that PAWN was white ENOUGHFor some reason I see it more as them supporting a pawn that went against a black person.
Then explain them supporting c00ns who go against the black community.Thats because that PAWN was white ENOUGH
sure they would haveif it were the black ATL Mall cop that did it, they still would have let him off. they wanted to send a message to black youth and zimmerman was the perfect vessel at the time.
apples and orangesThen explain them supporting c00ns who go against the black community.
sure they would have
Nope, its the same shyt different toilet.apples and oranges
And you still have not defined what a "white" person is...You keep changing the subject when that question is asked..Why?did you ever read the comment sections in his videos? hell, they raised 25,000 dollars for him just for hitting a hoodrat with a taser
What part of "social construct" don't you dumb fukks get? I've responded to this stupid ass "argument" at least 3-4 times.this is just ridiculous breh, this basically reads you are what the white majority say you are.
fukk you. Don't quote or tag me. I deliberately skip your posts now.
It's a term that was literally created by whites based on their racial classifications. It's ironic that someone who apparently wants to challenge the racial classifications established by whites would use a term like "sub-Saharan African". The contradiction probably flies over your head. I don't like the term because it's nonsensical. The idea that dark skinned blacks aren't the native people of all of Africa is just silly.How is Sub Saharan a "loaded bullshyt" term?
I'm not going to argue the amount of African ancestry in Italians because it's irrelevant to my point. You are attempting to dodge my point by clouding the issue. The point with Italians is that they are now claimed by white people when in the past they were considered non white mixed race people who were oppressed by white supremacy.You can't argue how much African ancestry Italians have because you don't know.
Now you're just pulling lies out of your ass. When were biracial people not considered black? Don't come with that mulato, quadroon, ect bullshyt because those have always seen as subsets of black people. Black mixed people have never been looked at as a separate race to blacks.Who cares if Italians weren't initially claimed as Whites. Bi-racial people were not initially considered Black (if you want to take it all the way back)
Sadly dude seems to be dead ass serious. He's truly this dumb.That marcus dude is just trolling at this point..Nobody is that dumb formal..Or are they?
Basically over 50% makes you that race Is how I saw it.
Most cases I saw 75% as black
Is 51% possible?