I don't see how else to look at it
any explanation that involves the supernatural is not science
Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism Documentary
- Thread starter CouldntBeMeTho
- Start date
I don't see how else to look at it
any explanation that involves the supernatural is not science
no true scotsman?
im not going to go research or find links on the internet just to prove something to u that we all know is true. u kno exactly the type of people who im talking about, but youd rather sit there on your high horse and make smug comments.
weve all seen the type of people who laugh off evolution as an entire theory because its not gods word. if your just gonna sit there and tell me to find a specific example you arent making a point
Brown_Pride
All Star
take it for what's it's worthJust remember there's another thread where a "scientist" is talking about the "theory of space", if we don't differentiate between true scottsmen and fake ones then we're destined to be fooled eventually.
Hmmm
There needs to be a new "debate term" coined, one that points out that there are times when an englishman is pretending to be a scottsman and it's ok to point it out.
"No No true scottsman"?
"No really, he ain't a true scottsman"?
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
HARUN YAHYA IS A WELL KNOWN MUSLIM CREATIONIST WHO DISTRIBUTES ANTI-SCIENCE PROPAGANDA, BROTHER!
KEN HAM IS A WELL KNOWN CHRISTIAN CREATIONIST WHO CLAIMS THE EARTH IS 6000 YEARS OLD, BROTHER!
KEN HAM IS A WELL KNOWN CHRISTIAN CREATIONIST WHO CLAIMS THE EARTH IS 6000 YEARS OLD, BROTHER!
Ken Ham said:
Brown_Pride
All Star
i got ya. I acknowledge that there are some members of the religious have undesirables traits.
ah atheists, their whole life spent trying to push their agenda
Wow. Simply wow.
Let's recap, shall we? @the cac mamba said "science disproves several religious "facts" and "truths"" and when asked for an example he gave the very weak example that many who lack understanding would give and said "the young earth theory" which is a big red flag meaning "I don't have a clue what I'm talking about." And that's the "example he chose to use.
When quickly debunked and again asked for an example he says "im not going to go research or find links on the internet just to prove something to u that we all know is true." Well I do believe this argument is worse than "The Bible is true because the Bible says it's true" argument.
"Science disproves several religious facts" but @the cac mamba is "not going to go research or find links on the internet just to prove something to u that we all know is true."
Ok. For the record, I asked you for an example to backup your ridiculous claim and you failed to provide a single one.
Thank you. For both your effort and the laugh.
Last edited by a moderator:
HARUN YAHYA IS A WELL KNOWN MUSLIM CREATIONIST WHO DISTRIBUTES ANTI-SCIENCE PROPAGANDA, BROTHER!
KEN HAM IS A WELL KNOWN CHRISTIAN CREATIONIST WHO CLAIMS THE EARTH IS 6000 YEARS OLD, BROTHER!
I will answer this ridiculous post with a story and hope your brain is evolved enough to comprehend.
A guide was taking a party round the British Museum. 'This sarcophagus is five thousand years old.' A bearded figure with a turban stepped forward.
'You are mistaken,' said Nasrudin, 'for it is five thousand and three years old.'
Everyone was impressed, and the guide was not pleased. They passed into another room.
'This vase', said the guide, 'is two thousand five hundred years old.'
'Two thousand five hundred and three,' intoned Nasrudin. 'Now look here,' said the guide, 'how can you date things so precisely ? I don't care if you do come from the East, people just don't know things like that.'
'Simple,' said Nasrudin. 'I was last here three years ago. That time you said the vase was two thousand five hundred years old.'
Moral: It's later than you think.
If creationists claim the Earth took 6000 years to form, why would it still be 6000 years old today? Will it still be 6000 years old next year? It took 9 months for you to develop in your mother's womb but surely you have lived for some time after that.
You're not using your intellect to its full capacity. Or are you?
How about the crazy nonsense in Leviticus 14 about cleansing a leper. Some nonsense about killing birds and lambs and sprinkling blood. We know for certain that this is not the way treat an illness.
So disagreeing with one scientific theory which itself hasn't been proven means one is against all science.
That is revealing information to say the least. Unfortunately for you, it doesn't reveal anything about creationists but it says quite a bit about you.
Are you sure that's the stance you want to take?
HARUN YAHYA IS A WELL KNOWN MUSLIM CREATIONIST WHO DISTRIBUTES ANTI-SCIENCE PROPAGANDA, BROTHER!
KEN HAM IS A WELL KNOWN CHRISTIAN CREATIONIST WHO CLAIMS THE EARTH IS 6000 YEARS OLD, BROTHER!
Kirk Cameron and Kent Hovind are more examples.
I believe the Bible has been corrupted by man so perhaps you may find scientific inconsistencies in it.
But there are certainly many ways to treat illnesses. I don't recall the particular story you're referring to off the top of my head but keep in mind that the Bible was never meant to be a book of medicine.
If you're sick I would suggest you see a Doctor. The Creator blessed man with intelligence to use the many bounties of the Earth to his advantage.