Be dumb to think Americans were living on farms/homesteads or crowded tenements with just mom + dad + kids
(Okay, honest question, are you retarded or gay?)
First, stop claiming X if your not gonna provide the evidence for it. I will never take anything you say as true just because you say so.
Second, you're arguing something that is irrelevant to the debate. There is no meaningful difference between those terms in regards to the effect that they have on a groups culture. If it's extended or nuclear, it still leads to the same observations, a strong family unit serving as the "glue" for transferred values. You can't say the same for groups that have an abundance of single, wedlock, female lead households. What do you not understand about that?
Like your being such an disingenuous piece of shyt by pretending that there is some greater point to be made by debating about the details of nuclear vs extended. It's literally semantics, how can you be that much of a fgt to not see that?
just because your aunt and uncle live nearby doesn't negate the effects that come from a child being raised by two parents. fukk it, if it makes you happy every group had extended family types pre the 40s or whatever. Matter of fact, with the communication tech today, every family structure is potential extended. How does that change the fact that AA had a strong family presence after slavery and it thrived until the 60s? I'll tell you, IT DOESN'T.
inb4 you deflect the majority of what I wrote, so you can shytpost, again.
