WTFisWallace?
All Star
It's sad to see that across the board the labor side of the agencies aren't responding in unison. A divided / fractured response is what they use to see which folks are the type to comply preemptively.I’m off Sunday Monday so I would have missed the deadline. But I knew I wouldn’t have to answer it without it first getting verified by Headquarters and the legality of it by my union. I told my GF give it 24 hours and they will tell us not to answer it. I work for TSA under the DHS. Our jobs are need to know and protected under SSI.
These idiots downfall is that they still think they can ran a government like they do their private companies. You’re not a CEO, you’re a public servant. There’s laws to protected and prevent dictators and over reach from government entities.
And to your point about it having to come from within the agency for it to be legitimate.....so many scary folks in so many positions. Seems like DoT worded it as you "should' comply / "encouraged" to comply. Not must/shall.
And now middle management is regurgitating the same wording......enough so that it "seems" like an official order from actual management and not Musk...so that they won't catch any heat from Musk. But worded just enough so that it's not actual order to cover themselves from liability.
"shyt rolls down hill, I'm just here to facilitate it"
- Middle Management America
Last edited: