You're arguing murder with the basis of intentBoth parties would get charged if dude lived, but self defense goes out the window when you engage in confrontation. At least where Im from, say I get in a street fight with someone who mutually agreed to do so, with witnesses present, we both catch a disorderly. If I swing on someone who doesnt wanna fight, assault. If I engage in confrontation, go to my car and grab a gun, then come back and fire....murder. I know Texas is real liberal with gun laws, but the fact that both parties couldve walked away will definitely be a factor. Yall forget, what youre saying is exactly the type of shyt George Zimmermans defense came with to get him offThey both met up in conflict when both couldve walked away. Thats never self defense, they were both looking for a fight AND its on camera. Only difference is that one party was outgunned. And even if folks do somehow get off, as mentioned earlier, the dad might get off, the son wont because dude was no longer a threat once he caught two to the chest. The shotgun blast was excessive.
self defense is a very different argument that factors in more than that. Castle Doctrine has nothing to do with this lol. I don't see a street fight here, its a heated dispute where both parties felt sufficiently threatened enough to bring weapons. Both parties came ready for smoke. That's not intent, that's identifying a potential danger and preparing against it - which is entirely within everyone's right to do.You'd have a point IF they returned for this dispute and immediately shot the man.... but that's not what happened at all is it? They asked the aggressor in the situation to walk away. They fired the warning shot. They stated they'd be willing to use lethal force. They were the ones that got swung on first. You can debate the quality or authencity of those actions, but the attempts to deescalate clearly favored the shooters here

shotgun while he was on the ground was a bit much though
cac jr wanted a body. but that's a time frame of 3 seconds at the most. hard to pin a guy for that small of a reaction windowunless they're black of course
They both met up in conflict when both couldve walked away. Thats never self defense, they were both looking for a fight AND its on camera. Only difference is that one party was outgunned. And even if folks do somehow get off, as mentioned earlier, the dad might get off, the son wont because dude was no longer a threat once he caught two to the chest. The shotgun blast was excessive.


never said it was straight up "not going to jail" self defense either breh, just substantially difficult to use your definition of intent because they brought weapons that happened to be bigger



You keep talking about some motherfukking garbage/a mattress. Dont fukking matter what the fukk it was about. 



mah nicca, I've got a clean record, and Im just glad I can pontificate on the clock and wasnt no Melanoids involved. 