Well to be fair you have that same opinion of all non-neoliberalstruly awful person
Well to be fair you have that same opinion of all non-neoliberalstruly awful person
trayvon martin a conspiracy tho that couldnt be farther from the truth
a fakkit coward wanted to play cop, got out of his car only because he had a gun, started shyt with a kid, and when the kid was beating him in the fight he pulled the gun out and shot him. then he was acquitted because of some vague bullshyt self defense 'law and order' claim that was biased against a black teenagerSo what is the truth here in this case?
All non-eyewitness information that we are exposed to is curated in some way. Recognizing who is curating and proffering it is important. This is probably something we agree on. However, what we might disagree on is 1. Who we trust to give us information and 2. what conclusions we draw from that information.
I prefer to trust professionals and academic sources for my understanding of worlds in which I have no personal experience with. You prefer to trust Alex Jones and his ilk. The reason I support professionals ( and not blindly: bias and being incorrect is rampant in all fields) more than conspiracist laymen is because I understand the process in which they generate consumptive knowledge. This process for academics is empirically driven, based on reason, and subject to legitimate criticism and peer review. This process is objectively better at producing knowledge than that which conspiracists use. Because of this, I believe the reason "things" and "events" happen is a complex interplay between economic, social, and political structures and human agency that is undergirded by historical processes, not the ruminations of some secret class of oppressors or god knows what else you think of next.
Those who do not possess the educational opportunity, the requisite intellect, or in most cases, the dedication to finding real proof to understand the processes which guide the course of human history sometimes compensate by inventing their own, simple, easy to understand, but completely fictional constructs (like the Reptilians) to explain things in its place. If you understand life, nothing is simple enough to be explained by your half-witted theories.
a fakkit coward wanted to play cop, got out of his car only because he had a gun, started shyt with a kid, and when the kid was beating him in the fight he pulled the gun out and shot him. then he was acquitted because of some vague bullshyt self defense 'law and order' claim that was biased against a black teenager
one who couldnt bear to see what was gonna be a certain outcome? is far more likely than what you're inferring
Tracy Martin( the father) wasn't even in court during the verdict because he was receiving his 33rd degree. What parent does this?
one who couldnt bear to see what was gonna be a certain outcome? is far more likely than what you're inferring
what the fukk did "they" accomplish with that whole situation then?
Tracy Martin( the father) wasn't even in court during the verdict because he was receiving his 33rd degree. What parent does this?
3a. To you Reptiles don't exist. Reptiles do in reality. Dismissing Reptilians is dismissing Ancient and Modern History. I don't expect you to understand any of it anyways.
Wake me up when u have something important to say.
So you're an expert on parenting now? You know the defined presets parents take in the midst of the death of their child?
I guess when parents see their child dead, they go shopping, go see sport games, go throw a party. FOH.
Reptiles do exist in the form of an Iguana, snake, alligator, etc..., and have in the past in massive form such as the Tyrannosaurus Rex. But if you think there is a sentient, human-like Reptilian race, you're out of your mind. That is the opposite of using your cognitive brain, rather you've decided to inculcate yourself in delusions far removed from actual reality or scientific reasoning.
Obviously you know very little about history but i'll let you think science is going to help you with that.
If the degree to which "importance" is judged by fringe thinking, then everything I say here on out won't be deemed important. I refuse to base my research and ideas on a bunch of blog posts, Ancient Alien television shows, and halfwits peddling invisible, massive planets about to crash into Earth.
Well why are you bringing it up then? None of that was said. Try harder in making your point about me. You failed twice already.
It's easy to not deal with actual reality and deem everything a conspiracy. Reality is hard, and if you have to face it head-on, you'd probably crumble. There always has to be a clear bad guy. A black and white; good vs. evil. This ain't the movies, so stop dreaming, kid.
Who is this bad guy you speak of?
So no other color exist in the world...just black and white. Another fail.
Sounds like you been watching too many movies to think reality is just hard all the time.
Condescending tones proves you can't cope outside your box. You got too much emotion into this.
Whether or not I believe of his own formed theories I appreciate that there are people who don't accept everything the Mainstream Media tells them is FACT.
@thekingsmen
(1) Everyone has different ways of coping. Your naivety expresses itself in your lack of understanding that there are obvious stages to handling grief. There isn't a defined way of grieving for the loss of a loved one. That is what I am trying to say, and to say he "sacrificed" his kid because he is apart of some Masonic order is not correct thinking, and lacks evidence.
(2) I know a thing or two about history, so tell me what you mean by "Reptiles"?
(3) My point and assumptions about you are as accurate as you think your assumptions are of Tracy Martin.