She would never get flamed like the young demi god alek wek
No it didn't stupid. All haplogroups tells you is that two groups of people had a common ancestor X number of years ago. Haplogroups don't tell you shyt about phenotypes.
Just look at Haplogroup D. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_D_(Y-DNA) It includes both natives of the Andaman Islands and Japan. Now tell me do these two people look the same to you?
You do realize there are subcategories for each Haplogroup?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_D_(Y-DNA)Subclade D-M174
This paragroup is found with high frequency among Andaman Islanders and 0%-65% in Northeast India in adivasi tribes.[5][6][7][8] And found with high frequency among Bunun people30%[9] (Taiwanese aborigines) and Cebu[10] (Philippines). D-M174(xD-M15, D-P37, D-P47) has been found in approximately 5% of Altayans.[11] Kharkov et al. have found haplogroup D-M174(xD-M15) in 6.3% (6/96) of a pool of samples of Southern Altaians from three different localities, particularly in Kulada (5/46 = 10.9%) and Kosh-Agach (1/7 = 14%), though they have not tested for any marker of the subclade D-M55 or D-P99. Kharkov et al. also have reported finding haplogroup DE-M1(xD-M174) Y-DNA in one Southern Altaian individual from Beshpeltir (1/43 = 2.3%).[12][
You do realize there are subcategories for each Haplogroup?
ok lets try again
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_D_(Y-DNA)
So this subcategory is found in high frequency in the Andaman Islanders, the Adivasi of India, the Bunun of Taiwan, and the Cebu of the Phillipines. Lets see how similar these people look.
Andaman Islanders
Adivasi People
Bunun People
Cebu people
shut the fukk up about haplogroups
i love black women of every skin tone
Be an idiot and have no clue what you're reading brehs Go play with lil kids and stop quoting me, I'm busy
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1667068/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15611197
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17614917
you keep linking articles that you don't even understand
just explain to me (being the idiot that I am) how those 3 different looking people (the black Andaman Islanders, the indian adavasi, and the taiwanese bunun people) can have the same SUBCATEGORY haplogroup if phenotypes and haplogroups are casually linked?
Just say you don't know wtf you are talking about, breh. There's a reason why scientist can get a corpse, analyze it's genetic sequence and predict their phenotype. Read the fukking scientific articles and maybe you'd understand that those 3 different groups actually share overlapping phenotypes
if those 3 groups have "overlapping phenotypes" as you say, then so does every human being.......I can't think of 3 groups that look as divergent as those 3.......the Andaman Islanders look "more African" (since we're going for stereotypes in this thread) than most Africans......the Adviasi look like most southern Indians......and the Bunun look like most Asians
if those 3 subgroup members can features that divergent, then why is it so hard for you to believe Isha Sesay could have the features that she has?
I would say Isha Sesay looks more like the African women you claim don't have "cac features" than the Andaman Islanders do with the Bunun who they are genetically most similar to.
Those three share the same haplogroup, Isha and a Cac does not. She got those Cac alleles from a white ancestor somewhere down the line.
You basically sound like a cac saying a black woman can only be attractive if she has white in her....
at a bunch of darkskinned women from Africa not being black enough. You want a white woman in black skin. Look at the dumb sh*t you have to type up to justify your point. Are this woman's features "negroid" enough for you?
Her nose is wide. Her lips are fat. She's from Sudan also, the place of the original man. And she's still a great deal more attractive than Alex Wek What's your excuse now buddy