Well I'm speaking to a HL audience, i guess.... is the reason for the first assumption. Its what I read and determine as the majority VP.
Haha, very well, I'll give you that.
Would? What do you mean by would.. do you mean if he were alive today? I don't think we can determine that. We only know his opinions before he died.
Yeah, that's what I meant. Tried to edit it, but oh well.
And sure, we don't know that for sure, but I think it's likely. He died in the 50's I think, so that's before we had a lot of the confirming evidence we have today for the Big Bang and Evolution. He might have still been a pantheist ... a very poetic position that I can understand ... but I think it's very unlikely he would have adopted a belief in a supernatural creator deity.
What do you make of the theistic scientist today? IT's considered illogical and unreasonable to even believe in any form of god. So what do you make of the logical people who see the possibility in that?
Well, it's a very small percentage and I mostly attribute it to the deep-seeded indoctrination that the major religions force upon people. Even with the science we have today, there are still things we don't know, and theism provides comfort to a lot of people. Just because someone has an advanced degree doesn't mean they think 'rationally' in every aspect of life.