hes talking about the tournament.
i hope hes just trolling.
all personal preference aside, BAU was the shakey album on-site. they gave it 4.5 off GP.
these reviews dont prove much. AGAIN, its all about what they do at crunch-time. and you failed to show examples of them coming thru in the clutch.
you just agreed with me about de la & tribe. i dont know if you realize it.
next time tag me when you got some slick chit to say.
and when you do, show me where i called those albums classics.
actually it is.
more than that album. definitely.
youre one of those 'dont say much' posters that just tries to blend in with whatever's trendy to say on the net. know your place.
lets pretend that the jungle brothers were in their prime when they got 3 mics brehs.
you guys and your continued trickery.
so what if those albums got 4s? THEYRE NOT DOGGYSTYLE. so why keep comparing? its like yall are purposly glossing over my premise here, just so yall can continue pushing your points.
im judging based off the curve. when i see the lesser of doggystyle's contemporaries getting 4 1/2, then yes that becomes the main issue when doggystyle just gets a 4.
and yea, doggystyle is >>> or = to illmatic, which got 5. but im trying to play nice here with the 4 1/2, because i already feel like im talking to a brick wall, so why bother arguing about 5?
yea, AMW got 5, but they made sure the next album got 4 1/2, even tho it was better.
if this was tribe or somebody, they wouldve gave 6 mics to DC.
lol @ black sheep. here yall go with the focusing on the ratings of lesser acts again, as if they viewed them to be on the same pedestal as the top groups of that ilk.
and i'll say it again. show me a group like black sheep that got 4, and i'll show you better albums of a different variety that got less than 4.
)
