EDIT: SOURCE MAGAZINE BIAS PROVEN TO BE MYTH - Source Top 100 Albums list

Wacky D

PROVOCATIVE POSTING
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
40,458
Reputation
454
Daps
36,505
just because **insert east coast album** didn't get a perfect rating, it doesn't mean that the east got the same treatment as the other coasts.

for example, I think that GZA liquid swordz thread is the reason why this thread has been upped. people were in there citing that the album only got 4 mics, and using it as an example of the source's lack of bias.

meanwhile, theres albums better than liquid swordz from the west, Midwest & south that only got 3.5 mics, or only 3.
 

bigbadbossup2012

Biggest baddest boss
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
21,594
Reputation
-5,981
Daps
23,031
Albums that originally received five mics:

Albums that were not rated upon their releases, but were later rated five mics in 2002:

Albums that originally received 4.5 mics, and were later re-rated to five:

Albums that originally received four mics, and were later re-rated to five:

THE BOLDED SHOWS HOW MANY ALBUMS HAD TO BE EAST COAST TO GARNER 5 MICS

Notice all west coast albums that got 5 mics were either from ruthless or deathrow records at some point in their careers
facts
 
Top