Thank you.I won't claim to know blocks in either like that. I'm going off of the few times I been in both, never felt no discernible difference...
Disagree. Only Oaklanders and Bay Areans think of Oakland as the black capital of the West....
LA was always the black capital of the West, and always will be unless its population evaporates the way it currently is in The Bay. People hear me say that and think I'm saying Oakland doesn't have an appreciable black legacy----->not what I'm saying. At all...
South Central LA was always blacker than Oakland, and people make the mistake of comparing the entire city of LA to Oakland, despite LA being 10x the size of Oakland. That argument is designed to make Oakland look better. South Central is geographically smaller than Oakland but twice as large in population with ~2.25x the black people. That's today. It's always been a stark contrast...
Add in the peripheral cities that contribute to the black culture of both (Hayward, Berkeley, etc; Compton, Carson, etc), the cities surrounding LA have ALWAYS been significantly blacker than the cities surrounding Oakland...
People don't know LA so they erroneously say Oakland is blacker, and it was never true at any point in time...
And Mexicans and whites are reported as having passed Oakland's black population in 2012. That obviously wasn't a long time ago, but it wasn't exactly yesterday either, those communities have been there....
Asians will surpass blacks in Oakland by around 2027, if not sooner....
They don’t really understand how LARGE Black LA was at its peak.
That’s why I just laugh at most of the ridiculous shyt folks in here say about LA.