murksiderock
Superstar
Ahh OK, I see it is just about population. I was curious to see if demographic and geographic stats were the bread and butter of your stance or if you were going to delve into history, culture and influence. I had an interest in the latter if it would bring a compelling exchange, with you providing your perspective on those items through SoCal eyes.
Its all perception and opinion anyway. Agreeing upon an arbitrary black capital is just a past time, it has no real merit. Which is why I said and will say again, I won't debate it. Seems there is a chance you may be passionate enough to forget that part.
I did touch on history, culture, and influence, to which point I've said before and in my response, nobody can name where Black Oakland is stronger than Black LA in either instance...
You say "debate" like it's a bad word, its conversation with different opinions. At any rate, you may not like the black and white statistical argument, but at least it provides a base that can't be refuted, it's not an opinion. If I talk about anecdotal experience, as a Sacramento native whose lived in LA and been to Oakland, you understand that experiences vary and are subjective and wildly open to interpretation...
My thought was to be objective, to which again I say Oakland can't win a numbers argument in any format besides the contextless surface point, and Oakland can't win an argument on how it impacts black history, culture, and influence more than LA (not that Oakland isn't respectable in it's own right)...
You can call it a debate and use it pejoratively if you want, fam. I'm a Black Californian and passionate about the direction of Black California, past present and future. Alot of misinformation about Black California floats around on open forums like this, I just seek to bring truth, even if a lot of Black Californians don't care...