I misspoke lol, I meant to say he IS in the film. My mistake. My point is that the second film is almost entirely about him refraining from his destiny, knowing that it will lead to catastrophic violence for the universe, and then when he finally succumbs and becomes what he was meant to be...people are missing the point and calling him a savior when he's not. His ascent/descent to godhood even included dramatic, horror-esque music and people still missed the point.
The movie doesn't do that however.
The movie presents it as if he had NO CHOICE otherwise the Fremen would remain forever ruled by evil cac overlords who have now put an even worse person than Batista and the uncle in charge of the planet (Batista's sadistic brother)
The movie doesn't present another option.
There is also never no emancipation/rebellion without conflict, war and death.
You're trying to make the movie complex when it's as black and white as Avatar and Star Wars.
Harkonens and the Emperor = bad/evil cac overlords. There's no depth to those characters other than that.
If they weren't presented as villain overlords and actually had depth it would be different.