DIMES
Retired troll
Draymond ain't shytDraymond isn't the best defensive player ever but he's at minimum on the tier below the recent greats like KG, Rodman, Wallace, Howard, and Kawhi.
Draymond ain't shytDraymond isn't the best defensive player ever but he's at minimum on the tier below the recent greats like KG, Rodman, Wallace, Howard, and Kawhi.
People here actually arguing with a guy who thinks dray would lock up KAJ
i never thought this at all. Boguts weak ass let's TT push him aroundDray is a talented defender. But if we going by the eye test, their first 2 finals, it seemed like Bogut was an important factor defensively in the finals too. Well actually in 2015 they benched him for David Lee for offensive purposes.
Anyway, when Draymond was suspended for game 5 last season, people still believed Warriors would close it out at Oracle.
After Bogut got injured in game 5 and Cavs won, people dared to believe "oh shyt the Cavs might actually come back from 3-1 now".
Not saying Bogut is the better defender, but him going down game 5 was huge. But I guess it depends if you're talking every game or just the playoffs/finals. Dray clearly is the more talented player.
i never thought this at all. Boguts weak ass let's TT push him around
I didnt realize "The Warriors announcer says Draymond could shut down Kareem and I agree" required a counterpoint other than a chuckle and shake of the head.
this is the only site where they talk so much abt this draymond green
cant even score 20 pts
i believe is goin to win dpoy this time
but come on son
is the guy exaggerating? yes
but is Draymond one of the best defenders ever and better than Kwahi? yes
@Gil Scott-Heroin been providing proof while the rest of ya'll have made no attempt to put together a valid argument to suggest otherwise.
I didnt realize "The Warriors announcer says Draymond could shut down Kareem and I agree" required a counterpoint other than a chuckle and shake of the head.
How is that keeping it "real"? He NEVER addressed anything I said in here, he took the road of least resistance by referencing the in-joke. I've still yet to see anybody counter my argument in this thread.lmao you kept it real
I didnt think this thread merited 16 pages because the shyt is preposterous
It would help if you used your brain for once.cool but he aint the best of all time, which is what this thread is about.
That shyt is far from a good point. Have you not been paying attention to anything that's been said in this thread? Who are the big men throughout NBA history who you believe could guard 1-5, and did they ever guard PGs for an entire game?good point
That shyt is far from a good point. Have you not been paying attention to anything that's been said in this thread? Who are the big men throughout NBA history who you believe could guard 1-5, and did they ever guard PGs for an entire game?
That's the point. You cannot have it both ways. Either he can cover four positions or he cant. You cant give him this credit to have unbelievable ability to cover all positions and then say he is not supposed to cover guards and wings because he is a big man. By overatting his defensive abilities, you have brought on these questions.That shyt is far from a good point. Have you not been paying attention to anything that's been said in this thread? Who are the big men throughout NBA history who you believe could guard 1-5, and did they ever guard PGs for an entire game?