Tony D'Amato
It's all about the inches
If Draymond wasn't blessed to play with the goat shooting backcourt, he'd be nothing. He couldn't shine Rodman's shoes.
Draymond: “Old fvcks” need to accept Bron>>>MJ
- Thread starter dtownreppin214
- Start date
VegetasHairline
Veteran
So you're just basically saying Rodman is better because you saw Rodman defend Shaq and you didn't see Draymond defend Shaq.
VegetasHairline
Veteran
Too bad it doesn't work that way.
VegetasHairline
Veteran
I don't think he was. Draymond is a more versatile defender.
Tony D'Amato
It's all about the inches
What player has Draymond guarded that tells u that? Cuz Rodman guarded Shaq, Karl Malone, Prime Shawn Kemp. What ur were u born?
And Rodman could guard on the perimeter
I go by how dominant they were vs they're peers. MJ was >>> in that aspect.
Everything else is hypothetical based on unquantifiable comparisons. Different games different rules different eras.
Everything else is hypothetical based on unquantifiable comparisons. Different games different rules different eras.
VegetasHairline
Veteran
You're just talking about ability to guard post players. The game ain't played that way anymore. There's not an abundance of elite post players.
Rodman ain't switching and guarding the perimeter like Draymond. Draymond is a better shot blocker too. Better at getting steals as well.
You're clearly biased against Draymond, like most of this site. Don't bother replying.
viktordoomsecretwars
Superstar
Let's remember there's a big difference between the Pistons version of Rodman who was guarding the likes of Jordan and Magic on the perimeter and the old as dirt Bulls version of Rodman.
Coli Hoecomb
Trollin' in my 64'
Draymond’s lack of respect for the previous generations that paved the way for him, or “old fukks” as he calls them, is very telling. 
The fact that he and his dominoes crew think everything that is “new” or “younger” is better, exhibits a certain degree of laziness, arrogance, and an overall lack of knowledge of the past. He’s too close to Larry Holmes gardens to still be thinking like that.
The fact that he and his dominoes crew think everything that is “new” or “younger” is better, exhibits a certain degree of laziness, arrogance, and an overall lack of knowledge of the past. He’s too close to Larry Holmes gardens to still be thinking like that.
Dwight Howard
Superstar
Yea good try klutch but no.
Verbal Kint
Superstar
I belive Jordan is #1 but you can absolutely find things to list that LeBron has more of than Jordan and make a similar graphic (won't be as many things of course). Assists, boards, whatever other nitpicky things someone wants to make. That's why all these types of things don't hold weight OTHER than reinforcing what people on that side of the argument already believe. Jordan dominated his era more than LeBron dominated his era. Can't we all just enjoy both lolIts hard to make a convincing argument for a guy who is an entire hall of fame career ahead of the other guy , whilst doing it in a much tougher, more physical era.
Lebron is 6'8 260 and has good ball skills. He's a really good player. He's supposed to dominate in the no-touch era. Jordan would have laid waste and seige to this powder puff era.
And contrary to Draymond, I'm not an "old-head". I'll be 30 next year. But most of the younger fans can know who the GOAT is.
28 Gramz
How U Luv That???
LeBron wasn't the best player since 2005. Kobe was the best 05-09.