You mean like the teams do?
The point isn't that teams don't WISH they were able to get out of the money they spend, its that they can't. Everyone knows the guaranteed money up front is 90% of what a player is working with in real dollars the years don't matter in the NFL.
SO, when A player who holds out, using his only leverage, to secure a more amicable long term deal with more
guaranteed money, gets what he asks for, then is unhappy with his decision and threatens to do it again a very short time
after he already did it, just looks like he didn't do his homework and/or shouldn't have signed the first one in the first place.
The same people in this thread defending him would be railing against any owner who tried the same thing if it was possible to role reverse.
I'm not an anti players guy at all, especially in the NFL, but it's just looks bad.