Does Lebron have sole claim to his own era?

Does Lebron have his own era?

  • Yes, all to himself (I might be an unreasonable stan)

    Votes: 27 25.5%
  • No, he has no era at all (I might be an unreasonable hater)

    Votes: 7 6.6%
  • His era is shared

    Votes: 72 67.9%

  • Total voters
    106
  • Poll closed .

steph_harden

Superstar
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
6,058
Reputation
560
Daps
19,292
LeQueen shares this era with Le Chef.

both with the amount of rings (if we counting the mickey mouse ring as a legit ring)

but the nba is built on the 3 ball now, i wonder who made it that way....

with that taken into account, who does the 2010s really belong too.....

Bronsexuals dont want to have that conversation though....

Might be more legit than those 2 KD rings

Bron has been the best player on every single one of his championship teams. The only other player you can say that about is Jordan..
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,599
Reputation
-551
Daps
21,442
Isiah got hurt and only played 48 games in 1991. He averaged 13ppg on 40% shooting in the postseason and was clearly not himself. On top of that, Laimbeer was 34, Vinnie Johnson was 34, and James Edwards was 35. Mark Aguirre was just 31 but had already been declining for years. They were all way past their prime.

The next season, Isiah averaged just 13ppg on 33% shooting in the playoffs and the washed Pistons were eliminated by the Knicks in the 1st round. VJ retired when the season was over. Year after that they didn't even make the playoffs, and the following season Isiah, Laimbeer, and Aguirre all retired too.


Anyone who argues that the championships Pistons were still around for MJ's three-peat is a clown. That team was done done by injuries and age, they weren't a contender anymore.
The Bulls rose up and ended their chapter period. I actually watch the games which requires you to actually like basketball not just regurgitate talking points and stat nerd bs.
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,599
Reputation
-551
Daps
21,442
Horace Grant played behind Charles Oakley his rookie year, who was a borderline All-Star. His second season Oakley left and 2nd-year Grant averaged 12 and 9 with strong defense, which was very good for a power forward in that era.

Pippen was a #5 draft pick the Bulls coveted and traded up to get. He was a solid all-around player by his 2nd season and an All-Star by his 3rd season.







Phil Jackson joined the Bulls just 7 years after he retired from the NBA, of which he had been coaching for five. During the five years of coaching before the Bulls, he won a CBA championship. So he had already proven he could coach. Rumor is he wasn't given an NBA job before the Bulls cause owners saw him as too much of a hippy/counterculture.
What was Pippen’s numbers his 2nd year? Was he even a starter? There’s only so much y’all can chatgpt before being forced to go back and watch the games. Most of the early 1984-1990 MJ Bulls games are easily accessible on YouTube so I don’t get why you always so wrong about shyt
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
50,892
Reputation
19,606
Daps
202,547
Reppin
the ether
The Bulls rose up and ended their chapter period. I actually watch the games which requires you to actually like basketball not just regurgitate talking points and stat nerd bs.

Jordan had nothing to do with Isiah getting hurt and missing half the 1991 season. Jordan had nothing to do with Isiah averaging just 8 and 7 on 35% shooting against the Celtics in the series BEFORE they faced the Bulls. Jordan had nothing to do with Laimbeer, Edwards, Aguirre, and Vinnie Johnson all aging out of the game. Jordan had nothing to do with the Pistons getting whipped by the Knicks in the first round the next year and never making the playoffs again.

You've proven yourself absolutely incapable of understanding anything other than the narrative you already believe. There is zero chance that you had a comprehensive enough understanding of basketball in 1991 to be able to interpret what was happening. So in retrospect, you went with the narrative.



What was Pippen’s numbers his 2nd year? Was he even a starter? There’s only so much y’all can chatgpt before being forced to go back and watch the games. Most of the early 1984-1990 MJ Bulls games are easily accessible on YouTube so I don’t get why you always so wrong about shyt

He averaged 14-6-4 on 48% shooting with elite defense. In other words, better than Kobe's 2000 Finals numbers. And how did you not know he was a starter? He was moved into the starting role in the playoffs during his ROOKIE season because he made the team better.
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,599
Reputation
-551
Daps
21,442
Jordan had nothing to do with Isiah getting hurt and missing half the 1991 season. Jordan had nothing to do with Isiah averaging just 8 and 7 on 35% shooting against the Celtics in the series BEFORE they faced the Bulls. Jordan had nothing to do with Laimbeer, Edwards, Aguirre, and Vinnie Johnson all aging out of the game. Jordan had nothing to do with the Pistons getting whipped by the Knicks in the first round the next year and never making the playoffs again.

You've proven yourself absolutely incapable of understanding anything other than the narrative you already believe. There is zero chance that you had a comprehensive enough understanding of basketball in 1991 to be able to interpret what was happening. So in retrospect, you went with the narrative.





He averaged 14-6-4 on 48% shooting with elite defense. In other words, better than Kobe's 2000 Finals numbers. And how did you not know he was a starter? He was moved into the starting role in the playoffs during his ROOKIE season because he made the team better.
So the Championship Pistons aged out while MJ was 3-peating in his mid 30s? You over complicate and focus on irrelevant shyt on purpose, I call that a waste of time. The Bulls walked down the Pistons starting from 1988 and eventually swept them in 1991 and that was that. The gap between Kobe and Scottie is the same as Lebron and Andrew Wiggins, don’t do that.
 

Greenhornet

A God Among Kings
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,166
Reputation
2,631
Daps
26,304
Reppin
Rochester Ny
glad I saw you in the 2k thread and you decided to make this one

small kids are big mad


nikkas comparing Lebron to Gretzky is nuts... Gretzky has the most mind blowing career in all of professional sports history

media optics are so strong, that they persuaded most of this thread to believe commercials
 

FlyRy

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
30,444
Reputation
3,044
Daps
61,534
I've already defined it upthread, it was 2006 (2006-07 season) thru 2020 (2019-20 season). 14 year run, where he won 4 MVPs, 4 championships, went to 10 Finals, was Top 5 MVP 13 of those years, made 14 All-NBA teams, 12x 1st Team in that window, 6x All-D (5x 1st), 2x DPOY runner-up, played in 11 conference finals going 10-1, won a scoring and an assist title 12 years apart, 2x AMVP in this window, was a 3x MVP runner-up in this window so realistically he could've won 7 MVPs...

Won 3 championships in 5 years on some dynasty shyt ('12, '13, '16); won 4 championships in 9 years on some dynasty shyt ('12, '13, '16, '20). And was the best player on his team for all 4 championships. The only other guy post-Jordan who won 4 rings as a #1 is Duncan, so over the course of the last 25 years, Bron and Duncan had the largest championship winning impact...

Post-Russell, only Bron, Duncan, and Mike won 4 or more titles as a a #1, that's going back 54 years with just 3 guys having the largest title winning impact...

Nobody has more of anything important in these 14 years. Not more championships or any of the other criteria I listed. He's literally #1 in every category but you swear he didnt have an era...

You advocated for Kobe upthread and Kobe doesn't have anything like this where he's #1 in everything...

In a 14-year run Bron was almost a guaranteed ticket, 10 Finals in 14 years and 11 conference finals. It was HIM every single year...
Powerful posting :salute:
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,599
Reputation
-551
Daps
21,442
Powerful posting :salute:
What was powerful about that Propaganda from that Lebron sycophant? You wanna know what else happened in the “so called” Bron era 2007-2020, Duncan won 2 rings, KD won 2 rings, Kawhi won 2 rings, Kobe went to the finals 3 years in a row and won 2 rings, Kobe had to teach Bron and em how to win gold in Olympic games 2x, Steph won 4 rings and built a dynasty off Lebron’s back, Steph also changed the way the game is played in Bron’s era. What an era:ohlawd:
 

FlyRy

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
30,444
Reputation
3,044
Daps
61,534
What was powerful about that Propaganda from that Lebron sycophant? You wanna know what else happened in the “so called” Bron era 2007-2020, Duncan won 2 rings, KD won 2 rings, Kawhi won 2 rings, Kobe went to the finals 3 years in a row and won 2 rings, Kobe had to teach Bron and em how to win gold in Olympic games 2x, Steph won 4 rings and built a dynasty off Lebron’s back, Steph also changed the way the game is played in Bron’s era. What an era:ohlawd:
Kobetards like to pretend Duncan doesn't have the same amount as rings as him.

During his "prime" where he "deserved" MVP he was missing the playoffs or getting bounced in the first round. Demanding a trade and whining in parking lots to anyone with a camera until he was gifted Gasol. Got lucky social media was in its infancy
 
Last edited:
Top