Yeah I get all that, but that final fight was so juvenile and basic that they boiled it down to evil bad guy vs. good guy. They lost the benefit of the doubt of any nuance with that boneheaded finale.I love WV, was just considering re-watching it.
It wasn't about cheering for Wanda, it was about empathn. Understanding moments in life where you can get caught up in the wirlwind for what seems right and righteious and making huge mistakes even with the best of motivations.
I felt that becasue I been there. Cheering for Hayward on the other hand is like cheering for The Sential program to succeed or some shyt. Wanda is a threat, just like Mutants in general are threats so it makes sense logically to try and build weaponry to combat them, but where are their hearts at? Hayward ain't give a fukk about the town, he wanted a successful trial run of his his new weapon.
Doing the wrong thing for the right reasonsdoing the right thing, for the wrong reasons
I understand both sides but I identify with Wanda more obviously, which is the point. If we going off just straight forward logic she should have been put down before Westview even happened.
And, give a fukk about the town or not....Heyward was not trying to takeover the world. He was the head of a government agency tasked with protecting the earth from intergalactic threats. He would be negligent in his responsibilities by not trying to reactivate Vision. It's impossible that his job would ever be "have empathy for those trying to destroy or enslave the Earth...don't be a big meanie who uses guns."
And...that was the dumb message of that show. Seriously...what was the writers intention in including Monica's insane line about how brave Wanda was? Do you think it was to build upon Monica's character, or to deliver the theme of the show to the audience with about as much subtlety as a sledge hammer? I suspect the latter....