What does me not visiting those countries have to do with anything? You visited those countries? Good for you. You want an award? You still have not corrected my claim on whether or not South African region is more developed than other regions of Africa. So my point still stands...
"Anyways, I think most of the countries in Southern Africa formed organically or its just that either southern African countries are more developed or don't have that many ethnic groups."
Which is why to me they don't NEED to "redraw their borders" because of lack of ethnic conflict. Which everyone in this thread claims is the main root of problem with conflicts in Africa.
And developed countries have less conflicts such as civil wars, because well... They're DEVELOPED. This is common sense and what is so "ludicrous" about? Developed infrastructure and stable governments minimizes conflicts and southern African countries have that compared to other regions of Africa. I don't care if I haven't been to a southern African country, I can easily read statistics and news online.
With no dealings with people of that particular region I'd once again stick to West/East Africa...
You know things you actually know about ?
There are other variables at play here so to gloss over that and make broad generalizations
such as "they formed organically" is largely ignorant...
They don't share the same history/resources/culture/population size or even colonialists
Conflict is about resources and control. We don't need civil war in the western world
we have feminism/gynocentrism/racism. The global elite fund these mercenaries and coups
for their own personal gain then let politicins impose sanctions as if their imperialist forefathers
weren't running around doing extremely foul sh!t
Afterall...if everyone is fighting each other...they don't unite to fight the one pulling the strings
I don't care if I haven't been to a southern African country, I can easily read statistics and news online.
Spoken like a recalcitrant first world c00n